🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

2 total messages Started by Jef Poskanzer Fri, 20 May 2011 19:30
bicycle speed limit on the Golden Gate Bridge
#131
Author: Jef Poskanzer
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 19:30
9 lines
1461 bytes
So, about the proposed bike speed limit:
  - Yes.
  - Fuck yes.
  - What are you, nuts?  Of course there should be a speed limit.
It's not a fucking race track!

I mean we can argue about the number, although personally I think
10MPH is plenty, but whether or not there should be any limit at all?
I mean really?  Really?
Re: bicycle speed limit on the Golden Gate Bridge
#132
Author: Jym Dyer
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 15:46
18 lines
2087 bytes
> I mean we can argue about the number, although personally
> I think 10MPH is plenty, but whether or not there should
> be any limit at all?  I mean really?  Really?

=v= Who is arguing a "no speed limit at all" position?  That
is not the controversy I've seen.

=v= The study that prompted all this found that bicyclists
on the west path tend to go 13-17mph, and have had very few
mishaps.  The proposal to lower it to 10mph would thus make
the majority of riders suddenly in violation of the law, and
for no good reason.

=v= The east path is a multi-use path, and there are even
fewer mishaps there (despite, or perhaps because, of all the
crowding).  The usual speed limit for MUPs in the Bay Area
is 15mph, so again, why 10mph?
    <_Jym_>
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads