🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <dorfmanEtpBrw.GDn@netcom.com> dorfman@netcom.com (Merlin Dorfman) writes:
    >Phil Ronzone (phil@netcom.com) wrote:
    >
    >>The key is contribution. Non DWEM-contributions.
    >>
    >>If it is isolated and not a contribution, then it ain't worth
    >>much.
    >>
    >Non-DWEM civilizations contributed nothing to DWEM
    >civilizations because there was no communication
    >between/among them: each of the civilizations had to rely
    >completely on its own inventions. When communications began,
    >Marco Polo brought back various Chinese inventions like silk
    >and the preservation of food using spices. Llikewise Europe
    >contributed nothing to the development of civilization,
    >science, and culture in China and Central America because
    >there was no communication.


Sigh - so much ignorance, so little time ...

The Romans were preserving food using spices since the begining.

It is NOT a Chinese invention.

As for "no communications", ever hear of the "Spice routes", or the
"Silk Road"?

Hmmmm?



Don't worry - someday soon you too can get some facts. Research FIRST,
post SECOND!

Try it that way ... it would be an improvement ...




-- 
"I didn't do it, nobody saw me, and you can't prove it!" - B. Simpson

These opinions are MINE, and you can't have 'em! (But I'll rent 'em cheap ...)