🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <philEtooxI.267@netcom.com> phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone) writes:
>In article <ddfr-2705981423330001@129.210.78.3> ddfr@best.com (David Friedman) writes:
>    >... I hate to break it to you, but the people who disagree
>    >with you don't get together in advance to coordinate their
>    >arguments.
>
>Oh, I absolutely agree 100% with you.
>
>When I assert that 1 + 1 is 2, I get a wide variety of disagreements.
>
>If "they" coordinated their arguments, I'd expect them to claim say,
>1+ 1 is 11 or some such unified response.
>
>
>
>So, to NOT avoid the main point, what non-DWEM contributions have been made.

You just used one non-DWEM contribution.

They are called Arabic Numerals.

>                                               -------------
>
>And contributions are key -- the current Sci. American talks about some
>recentlyu discovered Japanese documents that show some Japanese mathematicians
>were workj on calculus type math hundreds of years ago. But, it was buried
>and not known until recently.
--