Article View: ba.broadcast
Article #129497Re: PORNOGRAPHY FOR THE CHILDREN??? SO SAYS SAN JOSE SCOOLS OFFICIALS??
From: Phil Ronzone
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 00:00
48 lines
2773 bytes
2773 bytes
In article <dorfmanEtL1F1.1q3@netcom.com> dorfman@netcom.com (Merlin Dorfman) writes:
>>The Arabs PRESERVED Greek and Roman culture through the dark
>>ages. The Arabs did NOT have much of anything to do with law,
>>YOU FUCKING IDIOT! Anyone with but an ounce of intellect
>>would have KNOWN that the Moslem culture basically prevents
>>the concept of DWEM secular law, because the Koran ALREADY
>>has all the "law" needed.
>>
>Phil's language gets more putrid the worse he is losing an
>argument. He must be losing this one pretty bad. Did you ever
>hear of Hammurabi, Phil? Way pre-Koran, pre-Dark Ages,
>pre-Greek & Roman culture.
Snicker. Got the bastards.
Civilization is a DWEM invention. It was created and promulgated by DWEM.
Fact.
It's absolutely AMAZING how many dork-nuts, like Dorfman above, seem to
think that an early isolated miniscule use of something is the same as
providing it world wide.
Scientific American a while back described a thousand year old Chinese
natural gas well the Chinese constructed. Bamboo pipes connecting a
natural gas seep etc. Tghe gas was used to fire pottery for a royal court.
Did the Chinese invent natural gas wells?
No. Drilling platforms? No. Geologic theories? Diamond drill bits?
No no no ...
Or how about Chinese rockets?
Any 10-year old with some gun powder can/does invent rockets.
Is the Chinese rocket technology anywhere close to Oberth,
Von Braun, satellites, space stations? DId the Chinese EVER
figure out "equal and opposite reactions"?
No.
--
"I didn't do it, nobody saw me, and you can't prove it!" - B. Simpson
These opinions are MINE, and you can't have 'em! (But I'll rent 'em cheap ...)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<philEtMo9r.EC7@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<dorfmanEt9syw.GMG@netcom.com> <philEtKpp3.E8r@netcom.com> <dorfmanEtL1F1.1q3@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,979b805e81f3543f X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-Thread: f7d8a,979b805e81f3543f X-Google-Attributes: gidf7d8a,public X-Google-Thread: 104eff,979b805e81f3543f X-Google-Attributes: gid104eff,public X-Google-Thread: 10a942,979b805e81f3543f X-Google-Attributes: gid10a942,public X-Google-Thread: f4b7b,979b805e81f3543f X-Google-Attributes: gidf4b7b,public X-Google-Thread: 11582c,979b805e81f3543f X-Google-Attributes: gid11582c,public From: phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone) Subject: Re: PORNOGRAPHY FOR THE CHILDREN??? SO SAYS SAN JOSE SCOOLS OFFICIALS?? Date: 1998/05/27 Message-ID: <philEtMo9r.EC7@netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 357044685 Sender: phil@netcom20.netcom.com References: <dorfmanEt9syw.GMG@netcom.com> <philEtKpp3.E8r@netcom.com> <dorfmanEtL1F1.1q3@netcom.com> Organization: Generally in favor of, but mostly random. Newsgroups: ba.broadcast,sbay.general,alt.california,ca.general,ca.politics,alt.news-media