🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ba.broadcast
Article #129551

Re: PORNOGRAPHY FOR THE CHILDREN??? SO SAYS SAN JOSE SCOOLS OFFICIALS??

#129551
From: Don Wilson
Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 00:00
51 lines
3098 bytes
needhamnospam@syix.com wrote:

> 
> Now Lovable claims the San Jose Mecury is once again waffling on the
> REAL issue of the day, even possibly supporting efforts by the San Jose
> School officials who are defending a PORNOGRAPHIC reading entitled
> ALWAYS RUNNING.

If you read today's paper, they are defending it. But this is the same
left wing rag with reporters such as Paul Rogers who refuse to admit he
was wrong when he blasted KSFO as right-wing wackos when they broke the
story on MTBE and smog check II. The only thing that paper is good for
is my bird cage.

> Lee said "The San Jose Mecury rag would like to
> interview me regarding this book which San Jose School officials are
> both supporting and defending. However, if they want, they can find
> excerpts of this pronographic material on my web site."
> 
> Here is but an excerpt of Lee's web site excerpt from this book SAN JOSE
> SCHOOLS retains as legitimate reading for their school children:
> 
> "my tongue drew circles around her nipples, which were on a dark patch
> over honey-brown skin. My hands rubbed her cunt from the outside of her
> pants............"
> 
> IS THIS SOMETHING, YOU FEEL IS LEGITIMATE READING FOR YOUR SCHOOL
> CHILDREN?

Of course not. But this is what you can expect when you promote
multcultualism and keep the flood gates open to the third world.

> See the rest of this excerpt at:
> http://www.ksfo560.com/Personalities/lr_ReqReading.html
> 
> SEE THIS VALIANT TALK SHOW HOST KNOWN AS LOVABLE LEE AT:
> http://www.ksfo560.com/Personalities/images/Rodgers.gif
> 
> or his KSFO web site at:
> http://www.ksfo560.com/Personalities/LR.htm
> 
> and the KSFO web site at:
> http://www.ksfo560.com/ksfo.shtml

Someone from the San Jose Police dept. owes the people of Santa Clara
County an explanation why someone in the San Jose Unified School
District is not being arrested for child pornography. 

Also: See the post "Minority Schools promoting child porography". I was
unaware of this post when I posted that.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <355E3575.7BA0@aol.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <355C51A4.2ACD@syix.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,979b805e81f3543f
X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public
X-Google-Thread: f7d8a,979b805e81f3543f
X-Google-Attributes: gidf7d8a,public
X-Google-Thread: 104eff,979b805e81f3543f
X-Google-Attributes: gid104eff,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a942,979b805e81f3543f
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a942,public
X-Google-Thread: f4b7b,979b805e81f3543f
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4b7b,public
X-Google-Thread: 11582c,979b805e81f3543f
X-Google-Attributes: gid11582c,public
From: Don Wilson <scootoy@aol.com>
Subject: Re: PORNOGRAPHY FOR THE CHILDREN??? SO SAYS SAN JOSE SCOOLS OFFICIALS??
Date: 1998/05/16
Message-ID: <355E3575.7BA0@aol.com>
X-Deja-AN: 353919268
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <355C51A4.2ACD@syix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: 895366508 26426 (none) 206.86.0.12
Organization: Citizens for a better America
Newsgroups: ba.broadcast,sbay.general,alt.california,ca.general,ca.politics,alt.news-media