Article View: ba.broadcast
Article #129551Re: PORNOGRAPHY FOR THE CHILDREN??? SO SAYS SAN JOSE SCOOLS OFFICIALS??
From: Don Wilson
Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 00:00
51 lines
3098 bytes
3098 bytes
needhamnospam@syix.com wrote: > > Now Lovable claims the San Jose Mecury is once again waffling on the > REAL issue of the day, even possibly supporting efforts by the San Jose > School officials who are defending a PORNOGRAPHIC reading entitled > ALWAYS RUNNING. If you read today's paper, they are defending it. But this is the same left wing rag with reporters such as Paul Rogers who refuse to admit he was wrong when he blasted KSFO as right-wing wackos when they broke the story on MTBE and smog check II. The only thing that paper is good for is my bird cage. > Lee said "The San Jose Mecury rag would like to > interview me regarding this book which San Jose School officials are > both supporting and defending. However, if they want, they can find > excerpts of this pronographic material on my web site." > > Here is but an excerpt of Lee's web site excerpt from this book SAN JOSE > SCHOOLS retains as legitimate reading for their school children: > > "my tongue drew circles around her nipples, which were on a dark patch > over honey-brown skin. My hands rubbed her cunt from the outside of her > pants............" > > IS THIS SOMETHING, YOU FEEL IS LEGITIMATE READING FOR YOUR SCHOOL > CHILDREN? Of course not. But this is what you can expect when you promote multcultualism and keep the flood gates open to the third world. > See the rest of this excerpt at: > http://www.ksfo560.com/Personalities/lr_ReqReading.html > > SEE THIS VALIANT TALK SHOW HOST KNOWN AS LOVABLE LEE AT: > http://www.ksfo560.com/Personalities/images/Rodgers.gif > > or his KSFO web site at: > http://www.ksfo560.com/Personalities/LR.htm > > and the KSFO web site at: > http://www.ksfo560.com/ksfo.shtml Someone from the San Jose Police dept. owes the people of Santa Clara County an explanation why someone in the San Jose Unified School District is not being arrested for child pornography. Also: See the post "Minority Schools promoting child porography". I was unaware of this post when I posted that.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<355E3575.7BA0@aol.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<355C51A4.2ACD@syix.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,979b805e81f3543f X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-Thread: f7d8a,979b805e81f3543f X-Google-Attributes: gidf7d8a,public X-Google-Thread: 104eff,979b805e81f3543f X-Google-Attributes: gid104eff,public X-Google-Thread: 10a942,979b805e81f3543f X-Google-Attributes: gid10a942,public X-Google-Thread: f4b7b,979b805e81f3543f X-Google-Attributes: gidf4b7b,public X-Google-Thread: 11582c,979b805e81f3543f X-Google-Attributes: gid11582c,public From: Don Wilson <scootoy@aol.com> Subject: Re: PORNOGRAPHY FOR THE CHILDREN??? SO SAYS SAN JOSE SCOOLS OFFICIALS?? Date: 1998/05/16 Message-ID: <355E3575.7BA0@aol.com> X-Deja-AN: 353919268 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <355C51A4.2ACD@syix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: 895366508 26426 (none) 206.86.0.12 Organization: Citizens for a better America Newsgroups: ba.broadcast,sbay.general,alt.california,ca.general,ca.politics,alt.news-media