Article View: ba.broadcast
Article #241Re: KQED expenditures
From: Ron Drake
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 23:39
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 23:39
14 lines
1296 bytes
1296 bytes
I find KCSM and KTEH, together, fulfill my needs for public television. KQED is putting on a mix of shows that appeals to Anglophiles, gour- mands and searchers for the Inner Child. I think that they've lost touch with the Bay Area audience because they are trying to impose demographic standards to a public trust. If they'd start appealling to the whole Bay Area again instead of excluding those of us who are "wealth-impaired", I think funding drives wouldn't be so much of a struggle. In KQED's defense, however, I am proud to see our logo on some fine programs as co-underwriters. We are important to the efforts of PBS as a whole. I think that a new regime could restore some balance to KQED television AND radio. Are contribution to PBS is important but local television production needs KQED, too.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Jawara-120193152943@jawara.apple.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!apple!goofy!jawaraReferences:
<76215@apple.apple.COM> <randall.726538466@seashore> <1993Jan11.223558.19774@ads.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!apple!goofy!jawara From: Jawara@Applelink.Apple.COM (Ron Drake) Newsgroups: ba.broadcast Subject: Re: KQED expenditures Message-ID: <Jawara-120193152943@jawara.apple.com> Date: 12 Jan 93 23:39:30 GMT References: <76215@apple.apple.COM> <randall.726538466@seashore> <1993Jan11.223558.19774@ads.com> Sender: usenet@goofy.apple.COM Followup-To: ba.broadcast Distribution: ba Organization: Me, The Whole Me and Nothing But Lines: 14