Article View: ba.broadcast
Article #258Re: Would decalring bankruptcy protect iBiquity from the class-action suit?
From: DigitalRadioScams
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:21
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:21
59 lines
5251 bytes
5251 bytes
On Sep 5, 11:44ย am, "Liron" <nom...@sick.of.getting.spam> wrote: > So, what is supposed to be wrong with HD Radio that is allegedly spurring > this legal action? > > Liron > > "DigitalRadioScams" <digitalradiosc...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:1f41b54f-832d-4a82-956c-945c358275d2@d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com... > "HD Car Radio Investigation" > > "Consumer statutes and laws protect the purchasers of various products > such as HD car radios. A party may be legally liable for statements, > omissions or misrepresentations of material facts that should have > been know to be false or misleading and promoted the sale of the > product. Such laws protect innocent consumers from unlawful and > deceptive practices. The victims of questionable business practices by > parties such automobile manufacturers are the consumers who purchase > or lease cars with HD car radios at significantly increased costs when > these devices fail to function as they are represented to work. As > news develops and the investigation proceeds, Keefe Bartels, LLC will > carefully monitor events and research all relevant laws." > > http://www.keefebartels.com/CM/Custom/HD-Car-Radio-Investigation.asp > > "HD Radio Not High Definition" > > "Despite iBiquityโs claims of improved sound quality and transmission, > there have been numerous complaints about HD Radio from not only the > radio industry but also consumers... Automakers are aware of the > complaints associated with HD Radio. For example, in 2007, BMW > released a Service Information Bulletin describing the problems > associated with HD Radio, but noted that there was no retrofit kit or > procedure available. The attorneys at Keefe Bartels are continuing > their investigation into HD Radio and whether consumers are being > forced to purchase technology that does not work as claimed. If you > have experienced problems with your factory-installed HD radio > receiver, we are interested in speaking to you." > > http://www.keefebartels.com/CM/HotTopicsandAlerts/HotTopicsandAlerts1... > > With receivers sales flat, HD conversions flat, no interest outside > the U.S. in HD (the Swiss just canned HD), and with this class-action > suit looming, would declaring bankruptcy protect iBiquity? Could this > law firm also go after Struble and al of his cohorts, separately? With > broadcasters getting involved over loss of revenue from IBLOCK, and > false promises by iBiquity, this investigation could escalate into > involving many other entities. Keefe Bartels has at least BMW by the > balls, because BMW had a TSB and Trouble-Shooting HD Radio Guide > starting back in 2007, yet continue to install standard HD Radio, > passing the costs onto unsuspecting customers, and has no resolution > to these problems. I do have a bit of inside-scoop on what is going on. Some broadcasters are being call as witnesses, and this is going to escalate. Keefe has at leaset BMW and Volvo by the throat with their HD Radio TSBs and HD Radio Trouble-Shooting Guides, by forcing consumers to pay extra for technology that doesn't work. Keefe is getting A LOT of complaints from consumers. The investigation is still in its early stages.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3d00d955-cf0a-4bc1-b589-ddec9673f002@r10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!r10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1f41b54f-832d-4a82-956c-945c358275d2@d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <JUOgo.5584$FH2.4888@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f7d8a,43e116765073025f X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 10f32b,43e116765073025f X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 114aac,43e116765073025f X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: f508e,43e116765073025f X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 106eaf,43e116765073025f X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gid6677282e41,gid6fc345983e,gid9e586c3d78,gid4adb386be4,gid619ef4cb3,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!r10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: DigitalRadioScams <digitalradioscams@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: ba.broadcast,alt.radio.digital,rec.radio.shortwave,aus.radio.broadcast,alt.radio.satellite Subject: Re: Would decalring bankruptcy protect iBiquity from the class-action suit? Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:21:15 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 59 Message-ID: <3d00d955-cf0a-4bc1-b589-ddec9673f002@r10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> References: <1f41b54f-832d-4a82-956c-945c358275d2@d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <JUOgo.5584$FH2.4888@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.12.117.74 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1284945676 2486 127.0.0.1 (20 Sep 2010 01:21:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: r10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.12.117.74; posting-account=MheksQoAAAAY_3KK1YeLb4jAxUuBzWvR User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 (Velocity/3.1.1.5 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.1 spider-mtc-tb01.proxy.aol.com[400C7021] (Prism/1.2.1), HTTP/1.1 cache-mtc-af10.proxy.aol.com[400C754A] (Traffic-Server/6.1.5 [uScM]) X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; AOL 9.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506),gzip(gfe)