Article View: ba.broadcast
Article #296Re: Would decalring bankruptcy protect iBiquity from the class-action suit?
From: Joel Koltner
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:46
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:46
36 lines
3944 bytes
3944 bytes
"Liron" <nomail@sick.of.getting.spam> wrote in message news:JUOgo.5584$FH2.4888@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com... > So, what is supposed to be wrong with HD Radio that is allegedly spurring > this legal action? The law firm will allege that iBiquity presented HD radio as a system that's essentially a higher-fidelity version of the standard AM/FM radio experience, and then proceed to demonstrate that in actuality that's not really the case -- probably the biggest problem reported in the real world is that HD "lock" tends to come and go as one is driving around, and the "blend to analog" functionality in cases doesn't always work very well, making the listen experience annoying enough that many people will just force the radio into analog-only mode or switch to a different station. It seems very unlikely the law firm could prevail, but when it comes to things like, "does HD radio work the way it was advertised to consumers?," there's so much subjectivity involved that it's anyone's guess. If the law firm can get enough people to sign on, going after iBiquity might just start to look worth the cost. Personally, I'm betting the lawsuit will never proceed -- at best they'll be able to shakedown iBiquity a bit for an out-of-court settlement wherein the law firm makes millions and every HD radio owner gets a check for $5 or so. I am disappointed that the FCC selected IBOC as the one and only AM/FM-band digital radio format all the entire U.S. without even requiring that iBiquity openly publish the complete on-air technical specification, much less trying to stimulate greater competition for the best possible technical standard in the first place. (IBOC uses some -- apparently minor -- variant of the AAC CoDec, which is a good choice, but their their OFDM modulation scheme doesn't seem to be as effective against multi-path interference as it really should be.) Effectively the FCC handed iBiquity a printing press for greenbacks, and even if that press can't run very fast, the FCC's actions still don't strike me as having been in the best interest of the populace. ---Joel
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<fyOjo.126002$Qg.52153@en-nntp-04.dc1.easynews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-04.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<1f41b54f-832d-4a82-956c-945c358275d2@d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <JUOgo.5584$FH2.4888@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f7d8a,43e116765073025f X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 10f32b,43e116765073025f X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 114aac,43e116765073025f X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: f508e,43e116765073025f X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 106eaf,43e116765073025f X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gid6677282e41,gid6fc345983e,gid9e586c3d78,gid4adb386be4,gid619ef4cb3,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-04.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Joel Koltner" <zapwireDASHgroups@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: ba.broadcast,alt.radio.digital,rec.radio.shortwave,aus.radio.broadcast,alt.radio.satellite References: <1f41b54f-832d-4a82-956c-945c358275d2@d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <JUOgo.5584$FH2.4888@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com> Subject: Re: Would decalring bankruptcy protect iBiquity from the class-action suit? Lines: 42 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 Message-ID: <fyOjo.126002$Qg.52153@en-nntp-04.dc1.easynews.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/ X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly. Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:46:50 -0700 X-Original-Bytes: 3371