Article View: ba.config
Article #101Re: [PROPOSAL] reorganization of ba.internet into ba.technology.* subhierarchy
From: John Higdon
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 05:57
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 05:57
49 lines
3344 bytes
3344 bytes
In article <bdb7bi$9pq$1@reader1.panix.com>, abuse@MIX.COM wrote: > John Higdon <no-spam@amadeus.kome.com> writes: > > > > 1) It's an "OK" idea, not a great idea, and it bothers me that > > > it seems to have been motivated more by virtue of a personal > > > crusade (Habash's vis-a-vis John Navas, mostly) than anything > > > else. > > > In my fifteen years experience on Usenet, that's often the sole reason > > for group name-change proposals. > > You mean ala comp.dcom.telecom and comp.dcom.telecom.tech? I voted > for that one only because I got sick of the moderator (Pat ?, can't > even recall his last name now) scrbbling all over the group. This > is a similar situation, but I don't know if a similar solution will > accomplish the same thing here. Hey, I'm willing to fess up. But in addition to that being a grudge match, there was a moderated group involved in which there was perceived tyranny involved. No such condition, perceived or real exists here. > The way ba.internet currently operates is everyone picks a thread > and hammers away it with pretty much anything and everything. Then > it eventually dies a slow death, and then the next thread comes along > and the same thing happens over again. Sounds like Usenet, all right. > I personally don't care to slog through quite that much off-charter > crud, and I think something which deals that would be good to do. Shuffling the newsgroup names isn't going to accomplish anything in that regard. > But then having been at this since the 1980s I know trying to move > anything like this is damn near impossible - unless, I suppose, the > group gets nuked and others are created to replace it. > > I expect there will be too much opposition to get that done... so it > is probably wise to comtemplate some other solution(s) to the problems > some have with some of the goings on here... Actually, I don't see anything going on here that doesn't go on in every other well-attended newsgroup. -- John Higdon | Email Address Valid | SF: +1 415 428-COWS +1 408 264 4115 | Anytown, USA | FAX: +1 408 264 4407
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<no-spam-D9EF20.22572424062003@equine.announcetech.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.he.net!news.kjsl.com!news.announcetech.com!no-spamReferences:
<slrnbffk8a.12p9.the@wopr.bestII.com> <MPG.1962a528c2a5570b989e04@corp.supernews.com> <no-spam-5543FD.19262524062003@equine.announcetech.com> <bdb7bi$9pq$1@reader1.panix.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: ffafb,99f5739cc0053bcb X-Google-Attributes: gidffafb,public X-Google-Thread: fa874,99f5739cc0053bcb X-Google-Attributes: gidfa874,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-24 22:57:35 PST From: John Higdon <no-spam@amadeus.kome.com> Newsgroups: ba.config,ba.internet Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] reorganization of ba.internet into ba.technology.* subhierarchy Organization: Green Hills and Cows References: <slrnbffk8a.12p9.the@wopr.bestII.com> <MPG.1962a528c2a5570b989e04@corp.supernews.com> <no-spam-5543FD.19262524062003@equine.announcetech.com> <bdb7bi$9pq$1@reader1.panix.com> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.2 (PPC Mac OS X) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:57:24 -0700 Message-ID: <no-spam-D9EF20.22572424062003@equine.announcetech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: firewall1.announcetech.com X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: firewall1.announcetech.com X-Trace: 24 Jun 2003 22:57:24 -0800, firewall1.announcetech.com Lines: 49 X-Authenticated-User: john Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.he.net!news.kjsl.com!news.announcetech.com!no-spam