🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ba.config
Article #101

Re: [PROPOSAL] reorganization of ba.internet into ba.technology.* subhierarchy

#101
From: John Higdon
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 05:57
49 lines
3344 bytes
In article <bdb7bi$9pq$1@reader1.panix.com>, abuse@MIX.COM wrote:

> John Higdon <no-spam@amadeus.kome.com> writes:
> 
> > > 1) It's an "OK" idea, not a great idea, and it bothers me that
> > >    it seems to have been motivated more by virtue of a personal
> > >    crusade (Habash's vis-a-vis John Navas, mostly) than anything
> > >    else.
> 
> > In my fifteen years experience on Usenet, that's often the sole reason 
> > for group name-change proposals.
> 
> You mean ala comp.dcom.telecom and comp.dcom.telecom.tech?  I voted
> for that one only because I got sick of the moderator (Pat ?, can't
> even recall his last name now) scrbbling all over the group.  This
> is a similar situation, but I don't know if a similar solution will
> accomplish the same thing here.

Hey, I'm willing to fess up. But in addition to that being a grudge 
match, there was a moderated group involved in which there was perceived 
tyranny involved. No such condition, perceived or real exists here. 

> The way ba.internet currently operates is everyone picks a thread
> and hammers away it with pretty much anything and everything.  Then
> it eventually dies a slow death, and then the next thread comes along
> and the same thing happens over again.

Sounds like Usenet, all right.

> I personally don't care to slog through quite that much off-charter
> crud, and I think something which deals that would be good to do.

Shuffling the newsgroup names isn't going to accomplish anything in that 
regard.

> But then having been at this since the 1980s I know trying to move
> anything like this is damn near impossible - unless, I suppose, the
> group gets nuked and others are created to replace it.
> 
> I expect there will be too much opposition to get that done... so it
> is probably wise to comtemplate some other solution(s) to the problems
> some have with some of the goings on here...

Actually, I don't see anything going on here that doesn't go on in every 
other well-attended newsgroup.

-- 
John Higdon     | Email Address Valid | SF:  +1 415 428-COWS
+1 408 264 4115 |     Anytown, USA    | FAX: +1 408 264 4407
Technical Details
Message-ID: <no-spam-D9EF20.22572424062003@equine.announcetech.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.he.net!news.kjsl.com!news.announcetech.com!no-spam
References: <slrnbffk8a.12p9.the@wopr.bestII.com> <MPG.1962a528c2a5570b989e04@corp.supernews.com> <no-spam-5543FD.19262524062003@equine.announcetech.com> <bdb7bi$9pq$1@reader1.panix.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: ffafb,99f5739cc0053bcb
X-Google-Attributes: gidffafb,public
X-Google-Thread: fa874,99f5739cc0053bcb
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa874,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-24 22:57:35 PST
From: John Higdon <no-spam@amadeus.kome.com>
Newsgroups: ba.config,ba.internet
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] reorganization of ba.internet into ba.technology.* subhierarchy
Organization: Green Hills and Cows
References: <slrnbffk8a.12p9.the@wopr.bestII.com> <MPG.1962a528c2a5570b989e04@corp.supernews.com> <no-spam-5543FD.19262524062003@equine.announcetech.com> <bdb7bi$9pq$1@reader1.panix.com>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.2 (PPC Mac OS X)
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:57:24 -0700
Message-ID: <no-spam-D9EF20.22572424062003@equine.announcetech.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: firewall1.announcetech.com
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: firewall1.announcetech.com
X-Trace: 24 Jun 2003 22:57:24 -0800, firewall1.announcetech.com
Lines: 49
X-Authenticated-User: john
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.he.net!news.kjsl.com!news.announcetech.com!no-spam