Article View: ba.config
Article #114Re: [PROPOSAL] reorganization of ba.internet into ba.technology.* subhierarchy
From: Philip J. Koenig
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:25
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:25
51 lines
3548 bytes
3548 bytes
In article <45b6e1f9.0306290705.2621d364@posting.google.com>, Ulmo@Q.Net (Bradley W. Allen) writes... > > ba.technology.misc Discussions about Bay Area technology-related issues. > > ba.technology.internet Discussions about Bay Area Internet connectivity. > > ba.technology.wireless Discussions about wireless connectivty around the Bay Area. > > > > Sam > > A. Instead of the overly large "technology" which is difficult to type > and takes extra bandwidth, we could use "tech", such as ba.tech.internet. > > B. We could consider further abbreviations, including but not limited to: > tech->t; internet->inet; wireless->who knows but shorter; etc. > e.g., ba.t.inet; some of these further abbreviations would be > appropriate, and some would not (i.e., ba.t is not descriptive enough > for typical USENET group names), whereas some abbreviations would > still make some sense, such as ba.tech.inet for "internet". This would > not necessarily be a good idea, since "inet" could mean "internet" > OR "intranet". Making the group name "ba.tech.net" wouldn't be > about internetworking, then, either. Ok, I'm liking my point B less > and less. Nevertheless, I think it's always important to optimize > abbreviation sizes. "technology.internet" is just way way way too big. Short names are very helpful for web URL's because users often have to type them in. Personally I don't think they're very important for Usenet newsgroup names which are almost never typed-in by most readers except for possibly the very first time they read a group. (With my own newsreader, I virtually never type a newsgroup name.) The downside of ambiguity is a much worse evil than a longer name, as far as I'm concerned. Especially since "ba.technology.wireless" would actually be one of the shorter newsgroup names these days. Anyway, I still think the overall ba.technology split idea is a non-starter anyway. -- * If you listen to cockpit voice recorders from fly-by-wire aircraft that * * are about to crash, then what you tend to hear is the same sort of things * * that people say to their PCs. "How do you stop it doing that? What did * * we do last time it did that?" * * -- Ian Utting * * * * To send email, remove numbers and spaces: pjkusenet64 @ ekahuna27 . com * * Simple answers are for simple minds. Try a new way of looking at things. *
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MPG.1969152e8870aa4b989e48@corp.supernews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<slrnbffk8a.12p9.the@wopr.bestII.com> <45b6e1f9.0306290705.2621d364@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fa874,99f5739cc0053bcb X-Google-Attributes: gidfa874,public X-Google-Thread: ffafb,99f5739cc0053bcb X-Google-Attributes: gidffafb,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-29 16:25:14 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: Philip J. Koenig <See_email_@ddress_below.This_one_is.invalid> Newsgroups: ba.config,ba.internet Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] reorganization of ba.internet into ba.technology.* subhierarchy Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 16:25:04 -0700 Organization: The Ekahuna Organization Message-ID: <MPG.1969152e8870aa4b989e48@corp.supernews.com> References: <slrnbffk8a.12p9.the@wopr.bestII.com> <45b6e1f9.0306290705.2621d364@posting.google.com> X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.50 X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Lines: 51