Article View: ba.config
Article #124ba.cellular?
From: Sam Habash
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 23:18
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 23:18
14 lines
1312 bytes
1312 bytes
Maybe the whole of ba.* needs a reorganization, but it might help slightly to at least put Bay Area-themed cellular phone discussion into a more proper location if we insist on using a ba.* group for it. I thought of calling it "ba.wireless", but there would be some overlap with ba.internet, insofar ba.internet is used for the intended purpose as described in the newgroup cmsg, which many would argue is obsolete now. Ah well, it's just a thought, but hopefully, it's a bit less pointless than the nutty ba.technology.misc suggestion from last year. That still makes me shudder, and I proposed it! --Sam
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<slrncth0bt.2i1p.the@wopr.bestII.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsprint.newsread.com!newsread.com!news-xfer.newsread.com!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-12!sn-xit-08!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: ffafb,92b57455a536f620,start X-Google-Attributes: gidffafb,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsprint.newsread.com!newsread.com!news-xfer.newsread.com!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-12!sn-xit-08!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: Sam Habash <usenet@llama.sf.ca.us> Newsgroups: ba.config Subject: ba.cellular? Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 23:18:32 -0000 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <slrncth0bt.2i1p.the@wopr.bestII.com> User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (FreeBSD) X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Lines: 14