🚀 go-pugleaf

Paul W. Schleck <pschleck@novia.net> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>In <i5svqi$phg$1@news.eternal-september.org> sfdavidkaye2@yahoo.com (David
Kaye) writes:
>
>>dan_sj@sonic.net (Dan) wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>However, that's a moot point because Google Groups does not carry 
>>ba.broadcast.moderated.  I just did a search to confirm this and got back
this 
>>message:
>
>>"Cannot find ba.broadcast.moderated     
>>There is no group named ba.broadcast.moderated. "
>
>Yes, that's still a problem.  The solution to this problem is ongoing,
>and unfortunately at this point, will be political rather than
>technical.  I hope to see the political solution implemented sometime
>over the next few months.
>
>- --
>Paul W. Schleck
>pschleck@novia.net
>http://www.novia.net/~pschleck/
>Finger pschleck@novia.net for PGP Public Key
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (SunOS)
>
>iD8DBQFMgk/x6Pj0az779o4RAnu/AJ4gkZIptrv2ttHxBossO9edvJyvAACgqGy4
>RSkfsa1TLDN8RP4b9K+xMGg=
>=A1VY
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Greetings Paul,

Can you elaborate on how this is now a political rather than technical issue? 
More specifically, who is able to resolve this in a 'political' fashion (if
you know)?

Many thanks for your attention.

Dan