🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jun 11, 10:43 pm, copi...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Jun 11, 8:16 pm, Mark Roberts <markrobt+use...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > copi...@hotmail.com <copi...@hotmail.com> had written:
> > |  On Jun 11, 6:17 pm, "Eric C. Weaver" <w...@sigma.net> wrote:
> > | > On Jun 11, 3:07 pm, Stratum101 <j.coll...@cross-comp.com> wrote:
> > | >
> > | > > The obvious abuse by Higmonds
> > | >
> > | > How old are you?   9?
> > |
> > |  Exactly why this is such a good idea. Once the nonsense is gone, you
> > |  will see more broadcast professionals participate.
> > |
> > |  This newsgroup has been turned into a cesspool by a handful of
> > |  maggots. The majority of us first found this place because we wanted
> > |  to talk about broadcasting in the Bay Area. A place to do that online
> > |  without the slander, gossip and malicious crap that we've seen here
> > |  over the past several years is welcome.
> > |
> > |  You'd be amazed at the number of people working in the industry who
> > |  lurk but don't participate because of the Ras's and the Stratum's.
> > |
> > |  Good job folks! Looking forward to the new spot!
>
> > Thanks for the good word. We're trying (as best we can) to have the
> > discussion in ba.config, which is specifically for newsgroup setup
> > discussions. Hence I have set the followups to that gorup.
>
> > For the record, I am not a broadcast professional. I was once, but
> > that was a long time ago, and not in the Bay Area. I hope
> > that non-professionals would also feel welcome to participate and
> > to contribute to a ba.broadcast.moderated.
>
> > --
> > Mark Roberts - E-Mail address is valid but I don't use Google Groups
> > If you quote, please quote only relevant passages and not the whole article.
>
> Absolutely!
>
> I wasn't implying that only professionals should participate. I was
> only bringing up the fact that more professionals WOULD participate in
> the type of group you're forming.
>
> Having professionals and enthusiasts alike posting will make this a
> richer experience for everybody. Especially without the "George
> Orwell" pseudo slanders and the off topic character assassinations by
> wannabes and losers.

I think libel is the term you want.

It isn't libel if I tell you in front of everyone that
in a format already tailored for the brain dead that
you Brian Copeland are singularly dull.  It
happens to be the truth.

Now to say that you have the scruples
of a rat might be deemed moderately
libelous by other rats.


In accordance with a stated aim of the
RFD, I am cross-posting this to ba.broadcast.