🚀 go-pugleaf

>
> >
> Straw Poll:
>
> FOR:
> Angie Coiro <angieco...@yahoo.com>
> Copie <copi...@hotmail.com
> John Higdon <hi...@kome.com>
> Phil Kane <phil.k...@nov.shmovz.ka.pop>
> David Kaye <sfdavidk...@yahoo.com
> Patty Winter <pat...@wintertime.com>
> Mark Roberts <babc...@cosmos-monitor.com>
> Paul W. Schleck <pschl...@novia.net>
> Stratum101 <j.coll...@cross-comp.com>
> Mike Ward <mw...@iname-remove-this-part.com>
>
> AGAINST:
> Bozo <Bozo_De_N...@37.com>
> Colonel Jake <SergeantY...@comcast.net>
> Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> (footnote #1)
>

Excuse me but I'm neither for or against moderation. I just know this
group ain't going anywhere and a new moderated group won't accomplish
what you expect either. A moderated group is just another high-tech
term for a private club, one of the oldest social inventions ever
devised to keep the riffraff out, and that's all well and good, I'd
consider belonging too if I had the assets and bonifides to belong ...
but like Groucho said some time ago, "I'd never join a club that'd
have me as a member" ... Besides, it's sort of pathetic and funny to
see a guy belong to clubs and organizations he can't afford. That's
like paying to be a wannabe. But if you want to be, go ahead, you and
the pretty social secretary just have to understand one thing, you're
excluding people, that's the task, the main and only job, everything
else is meaningless. Whatever you do though, I can assure you one
thing, the moderated wannabes are going to be just as fatiguing and a
lot less entertaining than the unmoderated ones already here. Goood
luuuuck.

-BdN-