🚀 go-pugleaf

In article 
<54e89d42-419b-45f7-90e3-a3a16c6c079d@d19g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
 mjdix <spamtrap1888@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have an alternative and perhaps simpler and cheaper suggestion,
> based on an offer Mr. Higdon made the other day:
> 
> Create a local group that exists only on his newsgroup server. (E.G.
> kome.broadcast) Then let every one of the elect have access to John's
> server. This assumes most people are running a newsreader that permits
> multiple hosts.
> 
> No need to moderate: If someone acts up, kick him off and change the
> password.

For the record, my preference is for the standard group creation 
proposal. This provides the easiest path for participation by everyone.

There may have been some confusion about my preferences because I had 
offered to provide Usenet access from my private server for known 
individuals who got bit by the AT&T Usenet Pullout.

I am all in favor of the creation of ba.broadcast.moderated (obviously).

-- 
John Higdon
+1 408 ANdrews 6-4400
AT&T-Free At Last