WTF?: CA At-Fault Letter

Article View: ba.consumers

Article #191

#191

From: David Arnstein
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:02

15 lines
1459 bytes

A friend was involved in a car accident recently. Afterwards, her
insurance company sent an official looking email titled "CA At-Fault
Letter."

The email states that my friend is at fault for the accident. She will
contest this finding, it is not true. But that is a side issue.

The question I have involves the title of the email "CA At-Fault Letter."
This sounds so official. Are there any laws or insurance regulations
that involve this letter? The letter itself does not hint at any
consequences of the "at-fault" finding.
-- 
David Arnstein                       (00)
arnstein+usenet@pobox.com          {{   }}
                                     ^^

Technical Details

Message-ID: <f8om2i$ebu$1@reader2.panix.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!panix!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 106595,4538d0fbf5f930ab,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid106595,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!panix!not-for-mail
From: arnstein@panix.com (David Arnstein)
Newsgroups: ba.consumers
Subject: WTF?: CA At-Fault Letter
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 01:02:10 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: North Coast Nest And Noodle Inn
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <f8om2i$ebu$1@reader2.panix.com>
Reply-To: arnstein+usenet@pobox.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: panix1.panix.com
X-Trace: reader2.panix.com 1185930130 14718 166.84.1.1 (1 Aug 2007 01:02:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 01:02:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)