🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Jan15.123317.24266@llustig.palo-alto.ca.us> oleg@llustig.UUCP (Oleg Kiselev) writes:
>In article <1992Jan14.183658.14989@amd.com> jmw@brahms.amd.com (Mike Wincn) writes:
>>Without better support for your references I can't see how the title fits, 
>Which title?  The title of the article?  It's irrelevant, just a thread
>marker.

No, "City dwellers are all insane (sic)".  I thought that was clear. (Call it 
a title or call it a label.  Either seems to fit.)

>happy with its performance so far.  In light of the root of this discussion
>(is it normal for someone to see back-rubs as being solely a tool to try to
>get laid) this is not even relevant.

No, 'perception of reality' probably hasn't got much relevance to
the original topic, but this wouldn't be the first time that a thread took 
a different turn, would it?  I was more interested in "coping" versus 
"insanity", and yes this could be easily be discussed elsewhere.

>That's very simple -- it's *MY* definition.  If it does not work for you,

That is what I had assumed that you would say, though I had hoped for 
somewhat more stimulating commentary.

>use yours.  We can easily determine the differences in these definitions and
>avoid confusion over terminology.  However, I doubt that this is a place to
>hold discussions on the taxonomies of definitions and terminologies.

No, but then that wasn't the point and I've got no interest in re-writing
dictionaries.  

>This discussion has ceased to be relevant to this news group.

So it seems. 
--
John M. Wincn 	jmw@brahms.amd.com  		"Do AZ. I do."  
(408) 749-3156  DISCLAIMER:  I speak for myself unless noted otherwise.