🚀 go-pugleaf

AK>>if I were to come into a willing woman who was passibly attractive, had
AK>>a decent income, was at least trainable sexually & was truly serious
AK>>about making our life together something other than a living hell, I'd
AK>>damn well be in love with her inside of ninety days.  The thing would
AK>>probably last for the long haul, too.

AK>.M. seems to have left a whole lot of IMHO's or :-) from the post.

They're assumed.  I meant to include two gross in the tagline.  Still,
as Freud said, "There are no jokes."

AK>The former seems assumed, since I have not encountered anyone male or
AK>female here yet who shared this peculiar view or love and long-term
AK>relationships.

Well, I have so say from lurking around here for a couple of months,
I'm not in the least surprised; the postings represent some of the
most hopelessly unreal views of relationships I've ever read.  In any
case, the vast bulk of the world's population practice "practical"
marriages - & have broadly better success, at least statistically, than
educated (if silly) Americans.  BTW, my netmail on this so far is 100%
in support of my views...you could have knocked me over with a feather!

AK>As a passibly attractive woman, I can only hope that I never actually
AK>meet the above poster.

You may have had a near miss, to judge from your origin lines.  Only a
bad case of flu kept be from interviewing for a spot on LBL's Emergency
Response Team a couple of months ago.

AK>Oh, never mind, I'm safe... I forgot that I'm not sexually trainable.

Hmm...& you left out "willing," too.  You might consider altering your
attitudes.  Willing & sexually trainable are outstanding assets for both
parties in a relationship...trust me.
.   ~
.   M.

---
 * SLMR 2.1a * "Every woman loves a fascist"  Sylvia Plath


 * Origin: SeaHunt BBS, PCBoard / HST-DS 1-415-431-0227  (8:914/501)