Article View: ba.singles
Article #50538Re: Handling obnoxious e-mail (was: and you wonder)
From: Andrew F. Hampe
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1991 14:08
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1991 14:08
64 lines
3648 bytes
3648 bytes
Michael thank you very much for the following informative posting. I no longer take the matter personally - albeit I am still concerned as it seems that mr. bullough has a lot to learn about the problems of living in a free society. I can also now understand why he took offense at my trying to email him and take this matter private, as obviously he was not prepared to handle the fact that I HAVE SURVIVED FASCIST POLICE STATE SWEEPS! So I am not at all amused by mini_fascist playgames. ciao drieux In article <Apr.19.13.59.51.1991.1809@reason.ig.com>, mcb@reason.ig.com (Michael C. Berch) writes: |> In the referenced article, wetware\!drieux@uunet.uu.net writes: |> > greg why did you start by harrassing the |> > sys.admin first? |> |> He did it, I assume, because he has a habit of doing this sort of |> thing. Believe it or not, news/mail site admins talk to each other, |> and Greg Bullough's name comes up repeatedly as a soi-disant "net |> policeman". This is the same Greg Bullough that complained to the |> Stanford news admin about an earthquake joke that he thought was in |> bad taste, complained to a user at SRI about posting a for-sale ad for |> a small quantity of some home-made goods (a grey area of "commercial use) |> and -- when the user gave a civil reply and asked if Greg had further |> problems, Greg sent a complaint to the user's postmaster. |> |> This is also the same Greg Bullough who (while playing net legal expert |> in a gun control discussion), managed to misstate the law sufficiently |> in "correcting" the posting of a knowledgeable user that several people |> needed to point this out, with statutory quotation; this is also the |> same Greg Bullough who, after having played net policeman for all this |> time, still insisted on cross-posting his article(s) on the rather |> tedious Carrie Lay/James Bell controversy last autumn from soc.singles |> to ba.singles, (even though essentially everybody here had no idea what |> the context of the articles was, since the thread began in soc.singles) |> and in response to a note about this, replied "I suggest [use of] the |> 'n' or 'K' keys." Uh huh. |> |> Similar incidents exist, but as I do not have the saved articles/mail |> to document them I will not mention them. |> |> In other words, there may be a few site admins out there that do not |> recognize Greg in his role as Junior Net Policeman yet and act |> accordingly, but this number is undoubtedly getting smaller with each |> iteration. |> |> -- |> Michael C. Berch |> mcb@presto.ig.com ps: for those who haven't figured it out, trying to impress me by saying, well that's just like as if some one called you a <insert Ikky Here> trust me they have.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Apr21.140815.18725@nas.nasa.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!bionet!ucselx!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!eagle!data.nas.nasa.gov!scotty.nas.nasa.gov!hampeReferences:
<1991Apr17.130846.2174@nas.nasa.gov> <Apr.19.13.59.51.1991.1809@reason.ig.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 110235,f59356f189966dc9,start X-Google-Attributes: gid110235,public X-Google-Thread: fd08c,f59356f189966dc9,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfd08c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-04-21 10:13:43 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!bionet!ucselx!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!eagle!data.nas.nasa.gov!scotty.nas.nasa.gov!hampe From: hampe@nas.nasa.gov (Andrew F. Hampe) Newsgroups: ba.singles,soc.singles Subject: Re: Handling obnoxious e-mail (was: and you wonder) Message-ID: <1991Apr21.140815.18725@nas.nasa.gov> Date: 21 Apr 91 14:08:15 GMT References: <1991Apr17.130846.2174@nas.nasa.gov> <Apr.19.13.59.51.1991.1809@reason.ig.com> Sender: news@nas.nasa.gov Reply-To: wetware\!drieux@uunet.uu.net Organization: say what? Lines: 64 Followup-To: soc.singles