🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ba.singles
Article #50538

Re: Handling obnoxious e-mail (was: and you wonder)

#50538
From: Andrew F. Hampe
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1991 14:08
64 lines
3648 bytes
Michael thank you very much for the following
informative posting. I no longer take the matter
personally - albeit I am still concerned as it
seems that mr. bullough has a lot to learn about
the problems of living in a free society.

I can also now understand why he took offense at
my trying to email him and take this matter private,
as obviously he was not prepared to handle the fact
that I HAVE SURVIVED FASCIST POLICE STATE SWEEPS!
So I am not at all amused by mini_fascist playgames.

ciao
drieux

 
In article <Apr.19.13.59.51.1991.1809@reason.ig.com>, mcb@reason.ig.com
(Michael C. Berch) writes:
|> In the referenced article, wetware\!drieux@uunet.uu.net writes:
|> > greg why did you start by harrassing the
|> > sys.admin first?
|> 
|> He did it, I assume, because he has a habit of doing this sort of
|> thing.  Believe it or not, news/mail site admins talk to each other,
|> and Greg Bullough's name comes up repeatedly as a soi-disant "net
|> policeman".  This is the same Greg Bullough that complained to the
|> Stanford news admin about an earthquake joke that he thought was in
|> bad taste, complained to a user at SRI about posting a for-sale ad for
|> a small quantity of some home-made goods (a grey area of "commercial use)
|> and -- when the user gave a civil reply and asked if Greg had further
|> problems, Greg sent a complaint to the user's postmaster.  
|> 
|> This is also the same Greg Bullough who (while playing net legal expert
|> in a gun control discussion), managed to misstate the law sufficiently
|> in "correcting" the posting of a knowledgeable user that several people
|> needed to point this out, with statutory quotation; this is also the
|> same Greg Bullough who, after having played net policeman for all this
|> time, still insisted on cross-posting his article(s) on the rather
|> tedious Carrie Lay/James Bell controversy last autumn from soc.singles
|> to ba.singles, (even though essentially everybody here had no idea what
|> the context of the articles was, since the thread began in soc.singles)
|> and in response to a note about this, replied "I suggest [use of] the
|> 'n' or 'K' keys." Uh huh.
|> 
|> Similar incidents exist, but as I do not have the saved articles/mail
|> to document them I will not mention them.
|> 
|> In other words, there may be a few site admins out there that do not
|> recognize Greg in his role as Junior Net Policeman yet and act
|> accordingly, but this number is undoubtedly getting smaller with each
|> iteration.  
|> 
|> --
|> Michael C. Berch  
|> mcb@presto.ig.com




ps: for those who haven't figured it out,
trying to impress me by saying, well that's
just like as if some one called you a <insert Ikky Here>
trust me they have.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1991Apr21.140815.18725@nas.nasa.gov>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!bionet!ucselx!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!eagle!data.nas.nasa.gov!scotty.nas.nasa.gov!hampe
References: <1991Apr17.130846.2174@nas.nasa.gov> <Apr.19.13.59.51.1991.1809@reason.ig.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 110235,f59356f189966dc9,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid110235,public
X-Google-Thread: fd08c,f59356f189966dc9,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd08c,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-04-21 10:13:43 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!bionet!ucselx!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!eagle!data.nas.nasa.gov!scotty.nas.nasa.gov!hampe
From: hampe@nas.nasa.gov (Andrew F. Hampe)
Newsgroups: ba.singles,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Handling obnoxious e-mail  (was: and you wonder)
Message-ID: <1991Apr21.140815.18725@nas.nasa.gov>
Date: 21 Apr 91 14:08:15 GMT
References: <1991Apr17.130846.2174@nas.nasa.gov>  <Apr.19.13.59.51.1991.1809@reason.ig.com>
Sender: news@nas.nasa.gov
Reply-To: wetware\!drieux@uunet.uu.net
Organization: say what?
Lines: 64
Followup-To: soc.singles