🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1991Apr25.012811.6564@netcom.COM> greg@netcom.COM (Greg Bullough) writes:
>Oh, you mean like you did when you, oh advocate of "free speech," contacted
>Lon Stowell's sysadm, saying "I have a problem with one of your people...?"

Only after Stowell, after being politely asked to leave me alone and mind his
own business twice and, when that failed, asked to fuck off, has taken up a 
notion that sending me 900-line files and threatenning to sue me was a fun
thing to do.  

Mind you, Bullough, I asked Stowell's sys admin to explain to Lon what the
acceptable ethics of e-mail use was, not to have his account or his news 
access yanked.  

I can tolerate a lot of e-mail frivolity, Bullough, but eventually I get 
fed up with idiocy.

>I don't give a fig for Hampe's, or anyone else's net.access either way.
....
>And, I never suggested that Hampe's sysadm at NASA take any particular
>action. I simply called attention to the fact that he seems to have spent
>a lot of time on the public payroll on a public system posting stupid,

Yet you did white to the NASA sys admin about Hampe's postings from a
public access account.  Go ahead, lie.  Tell everyone you did not.

Since you are just the sort of person to never let someone else have the last
word, especially when that word makes you look like a bozo, have a courtesy
to follow-up to alt.flame
-- 
DISCLAMMER: I speak for myself only, unless explicitly indicated otherwise.
Oleg Kiselev                                             oleg@veritas.com
VERITAS Software                           ...!{apple|uunet}!veritas!oleg
(408)727-1222x586