Article View: ba.singles
Article #50570Re: Good singles
From: Oleg Kiselev
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 1992 12:35
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 1992 12:35
29 lines
2218 bytes
2218 bytes
In article <1992Jan01.001053.23328marv@netcom.COM> marv@netcom.COM (Marvin Raab) writes: > Is receiving a backrub a deeply personal, emotional, and intimate >act? One that you can participate in only within a serious, committed >relationship? Is there *anything at all* that is such a "deeply personal, emotional and intimate act" that you can't imagine participating in it outside of a "serious, commited relationship"? The only thing that requires a "serious, commited relationship" in my opinion is raising a child, but that relationship is between you and the child only, so it does not seem to apply to this situation. >If, on the other hand, a backrub is a casual act between any two people, >it would seem to me that any close friend, male or female, would suffice. For $35 you can get 1 hour of a really good full body massage. No friendship is required and you don't even have to say "Thank you". >Persoanlly, I think backrubs are a prelude to some serious affection which >should be reserved only for the serious relationships. Was that intended as an explanation for your perennial lack of SO, Marvin? Or are you trying to point out what makes you different from all other people? Normal people don't have a problem being touched or touching others, including giving backrubs to strangers who look like they are tense, non-hostile, ahad taken at least one shower in the last 48 hours and are not adverse to the idea of getting a backrub. -- Oleg Kiselev, at home ....use the header to find the path
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jan1.123533.540@llustig.palo-alto.ca.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!stanford.edu!unix!llustig!olegReferences:
<1991Dec31.224900.22031@overload.lbl.gov> <1991Dec31.235509.22254aahz@netcom.COM> <1992Jan01.001053.23328marv@netcom.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 110235,9cdc3e70260e2224,start X-Google-Attributes: gid110235,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-01 05:31:52 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!stanford.edu!unix!llustig!oleg From: oleg@llustig.palo-alto.ca.us (Oleg Kiselev) Newsgroups: ba.singles Subject: Re: Good singles Message-ID: <1992Jan1.123533.540@llustig.palo-alto.ca.us> Date: 1 Jan 92 12:35:33 GMT Article-I.D.: llustig.1992Jan1.123533.540 References: <1991Dec31.224900.22031@overload.lbl.gov> <1991Dec31.235509.22254aahz@netcom.COM> <1992Jan01.001053.23328marv@netcom.COM> Organization: Palo Alto Killifish Loft Lines: 29