Article View: ba.smartvalley
Article #666Blanca's Blight: The San Jose Idol
From: Dorr H. Clark
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 00:00
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 00:00
94 lines
5869 bytes
5869 bytes
I have a friend who was born in Cambodia. One day I asked her how she would feel if the City of San Jose decided to celebrate Cambodia's contribution to local cultural diversity by recreating Ankgor Wat downtown. She burst out laughing. I have another friend of Greek ancestry. I asked her how she would react to San Jose honoring Greek culture by rebuilding a temple to Aphrodite. Her quizzical look gave way to comments about the importance of the Greek Orthodox church. Equivalent to these two examples, I also asked a Hispanic friend how she felt about the "Plumed Serpent", artistic rendering of an Aztec idol which was commissioned by the City of San Jose. She said the Hispanic community "hates this statue. There are so many other beautiful things they could have chosen." Artist Robert Graham received $500,000 in taxpayer money for a sculpture of Quetzalcoatl, the ostensible relevance to public purpose that provoked this splurge was to honor Hispanic diversity. The original design stood 25 feet high with a 10 foot base, all bronze, and supplanted the historic Firemen's Bell in "Plaza de Cesar Chavez", a civic park at the corner of San Carlos and Market. In the face of public pressure, the city forced Graham to scale his creation back to 10' high and use other materials, he chose some kind of cement which has manifested as a dirty grey. Consensus regards the Idol as emulating the excrement of a Jurassic Park refugee. The prime advocate for this artistic blight was then a member of the San Jose city council: Blanca Alvarado, now serving out an appointed term on the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors. The Plumed Serpent is a recurring motif of ancient Mesoamerican cultures. The cover article "Star Wars of Ancient Mexico" from a 1994 issue of ARCHEOLOGY magazine documents how worship of this idol included various manifestations of ritual human sacrifice. When Cortez landed and began the process of intermingling which lead to the modern Latin American culture, the usual desire to fulfill the Great Commission of Jesus Christ was heightened by disgust for these bloody practices. By the time anyone of what we now call Hispanic extraction set foot in the Santa Clara Valley, worship of the Plumed Serpent had been vigorously suppressed. For spiritual guidance, these people looked to the Holy Father in Rome, as most Hispanics still do. Direct cultural experience of Quetzalcoatl is completely foriegn to every human being who ever lived in this county. This is not the first time Robert Graham has been found irrelevant. He was previously commissioned for one of the San Jose "Gateway" sculptures, where the theme was our agricultural heritage. The result was a yoke for a pair of oxen; this was turned down by the Gateway committee, to their credit. Anyone with the slightest glimmer of empathy for the history of Santa Clara county would know that the defining aesthetic event in our heritage is the flowering of the fruit trees in the spring. Visualize a gently ulundating surface. From this emerges renditions of bare deciduous trees in geometric rows. White lights are made to shimmer by shallow submersion, as fountains under very low pressure gently spray the bare trees from underneath, glistening drops on each tiny metal branch suggesting the awakening blossoms. No city funded education campaign would be needed to explain such a sculpture. Old timers would see it and hearken back to the blossom parades of yore, and a cultural legacy would be preserved. It is said each year around the Campbell Prune festival that no living prune trees remain within the town's limits. The memories need not die as well, preservation through commissioned art is a legitimate government function. The question is: which piece of art? Set aside the waste of taxpayer money. Neglect the spiritual ramifications of raising up this idol. Let us consider the Plumed Serpent solely on the issue of artistic merit. For most of this misbegotten century, it has been considered de rigeur to violate the sensibilities of the public at large. The more outrageous the violation, the more vigorous the avant garde's applause. This trend has been pursued to its absurd conclusion: artists strain mightily to further violate a post-Victorian consensus which no longer exists, and achieve nothing but conformity and convention in the act. Art speaks to the audience, society once held that good art uplifts the beholder. Even a degraded effort like Serrano's "Piss Christ" relates to the audience enough to offend. Graham's Plumed Serpent fails even this test. It is completely irrelevant. As noted, the primary promoter of Graham's edifice was then San Jose City Council member Blanca Alvarado. Minutes of the San Jose Urban Design Review Board meeting on September 15, 1992 contain her quote: "...the more I become involved with this project, the more profound my emotion and my attachment to this piece becomes. ...There has been for me a spiritual renaissance in researching the attributes of Quetzalcoatl.... I hope that it will be spiritual for other people." Allow me to suggest, Blanca, that the commission you engineered for Mr. Graham should have been funded with your own money, so you could display his creation on your own property. -Dorr H. Clark "A gentleman is not an implement." - Confucius
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4i658u$po0@crl5.crl.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f7111,bf277c3302c7d884,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf7111,public From: dhclark@crl.com (Dorr H. Clark) Subject: Blanca's Blight: The San Jose Idol Date: 1996/03/13 Message-ID: <4i658u$po0@crl5.crl.com> X-Deja-AN: 142807465 organization: CRL Dialup Internet Access newsgroups: ba.smartvalley