🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <121379@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV>, tdober@llnl.gov writes:
> 
> Here I go, writing a nice long post. My purpose in doing so is as follows:
> recently, I posted a number of articles to a couple of news groups. Some
> showed up; some did not. I am currently investigating the theory that the
> determining factor in whether or not a post showed up was how much text
> was quoted in the post, vs. how much was original. So I am going to write
> this nice long post, and (assuming it shows up) write a series of follow-
> ups to it, quoting different amounts of the original post. Hopefully, some
> useful information may be derived from the results. Tra la.
> 
> Here we go....
> 
> TDO
> 
> 
> 

Well, here is the last in this seemingly interminable series of postings.
Bet you never thought you'd live to see it, huh? My last post had
*******eight******* new lines of text; the original had 10, with one blank
line. Hopefully, the results from this will tell me all I need to know
in order to ensure my posts actually go out. There are few things more
annoying than spending my time and effort composing a post, typing it in,
sending it off (with no errors reported, I might add), only to have it
fail to show up! If I can deduce some kind of pattern, my frustration
level should go *way* down. (This may or may not be a GoodThing (tm)
depending on your perspective...my colleagues have probably been deriving
endless enjoyment from watching/hearing me rant, rave, and froth at
the mouth. Life Is Rough, folks; guess you'll just have to find some
new source of entertainment.)

Bye!

TDO