🚀 go-pugleaf

alt.california,tx.politics,talk.politics.mideast,talk.politics.guns,us.military.army

TWICE AS QUICK AND THEN SOME 091126:
WINNING OUR HUMAN RACE

=============================

My friend Israel Adam Shamir*, or "Ish" as I like to call him,
has just this Thanksgiving Day (USA) published the first installment
of his plan for global salvation, entitled "How To Save the World in
Ten Easy Steps, Step One."

Well, harrumph! I, too, consider myself a world teacher and prophet,
with my finger stretching out for the golden ring of the long awaited
Top Dog aka Redeemer, Mahdi, Buddha, wise King of the First World
Order, etc. Let us, then, play our credentials out on the virtual
table. For the Gentle Reader's (henceforth, "GR") convenience, Ish's
essay is copied below @ appendix mark ALPHA.

We will begin first with a grammatical note. What I have long proposed
as the XFG** or "eXperimental Feminine Generic" reverses the previous
patriarchal bias of the gender of the universal referent. For
clarification here, I point to the second sentence ahead in the next
paragraph.

Success obviously requires inclusivity. She or he who will lead --in
this case we explicitly mention both sexes but in the future this
duality will be understood from context and the "he" included in the
"she", as it is indeed in spelling of the two words in English-- I say
again, she who will lead must create an organization, a corporate
body, a social movement which cordially invites the full participation
of all people. The major religions in their respective heydays shared
this characteristic but they have all since died spiritually. Some of
the prominent corpses or zombies on display include Pope Ratzo, John
Hagee, Pat Robertson and the Dalai Lama***. Islam, being under such
sever persecution from JAPE (#4), has a stronger beating heart but its
weakness is revealed by the ancient Shia vs Sunni split, so
successfully manipulated by the wicked Jews, and also by individual
actions such as the ostentatiously pious Iranian President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad publicly supporting the faux judicial murder of his fellow
Muslim head of state Saddam Hussein in 2006 by the inexpressibly
degenerate World Tyrant SonnaBush.

I have proposed the formation of the Third World Age Matrimonial
Alliance or TWAMA (#5) to lead our human species from the painful &
dangerous strife of civilization to the harmonious maturity of what we
may at least provisionally call the kozmopolis.

In my next post, perhaps I will point out how we can use the following
four words: Slam'um. Grip. Toss.Trade.

To sloganize our four cardinal points of justice, peace, freedom & the
commonwealth.

In the meantime, I repeat that all poets & righteous men everywhere
should stand up to support my nominations of a) Major Nidal Hasan (#6)
for the post of General of the Armies of the United States of America
and b) Mumia Abu-Jamal as Chief Justice.

We note that Obomber (#7) has just plunged himself even deeper in
innocent blood by announcing his decision to send 40,000 more troops
against Occupied Afghanistan.


=========================

* {Results 1 - 10 of about 186 for "hal womack" "israel shamir".} From
Google Groups Page search 091127 @ 01:47 hrz ("z" = Zulu).

** {Results 1 - 10 of about 45 for "hal womack" xfg.}

*** Binary morons.
http://media.cnsnews.com/resources/55052.jpg

(#4.) = "Jewish-American Planetary Empire.
{Results 1 - 10 of about 136 for "hal womack" jape.}

(#5.) {Results 1 - 5 of about 5 for "hal womack" TWAMA.}

(#6.) {Results 1 - 10 of about 2,350 for "hal womack" justice.}
{Results 1 - 10 of about 442 for "hal womack" hate.}
{Results 1 - 10 of about 440 for "hal womack" violence.}

(#7.) {Results 1 - 10 of about 180 for "hal womack" mumia} from Google
Groups Page search.
{Results 1 - 10 of about 2,280 for "hal womack" murder.}

http://tinyurl.com/yaeutlj

Newsgroups: rec.music.hip-hop, soc.culture.african.american,
talk.politics.misc, alt.society.liberalism, us.military.army
From: Hal Womack 3-dan <hal.wom...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Impeach Obama For War Crimes? Will U B 1st On Block?

IMPEACH OBAMA FOR WAR CRIMES?

============================
ALPHA:

{How to Save the World in Ten Easy Steps,

Step One

By Israel Shamir

[A Talk given at the Madrid Conference, November 2009]


The world is ill; it is running a high fever. Global warming is just a
metaphor for this febrile life we lead. The first thing is to lower
the temperature –  to cool it.


While Obama’s team and their peers all over the world try to stimulate
consumption and encourage growth by making credits cheaper and by
titillating us with glossy pictures of new cars, phones, kitchen
appliances and attractive females, we should take the opposite
direction: that of reducing temptation. Let us remain blissfully
ignorant of wonderful opportunities to update our present arsenal of
appliances.


The temptations we ask our Lord to lead us not into are daily promoted
by the advertising machine, and they cause the neurosis and the
anxiety from which we are suffering. There is a secondary but equally
evil product of advertising, and that is the fuel for business-
dependent consumption-oriented tempting and titillating media.


Media has an important and positive function to perform: namely, it
helps people to exchange their views and form their own opinions.
Media is also a great entertainer, and that is also good.


While the positive qualities of the media should be preserved, the
deadlock of business, consumption and titillation should be broken.
Ultimately, this can be achieved by banning advertising
altogether,just as we banned tobacco advertising. However, a first
step can be less drastic, and it can be achieved without great social
changes, by separating content and advertising. Newspapers and
magazines should choose whether they want to publish content –
opinions, stories, news – or advertising. If you publish advertising,
you may not add content; if you publish content, you may not run
advertising.


Advertising media should be treated as pornography, banned from the
public space, to be sold separately in brown-paper envelopes. We can
learn from Thailand, where cigarettes are legally sold under-the-
counter to demanding customers but never displayed openly. Advertising
is more dangerous than tobacco, for it causes anxiety, envy and a
feeling of failure in the millions unable to buy the latest Jaguar.


This approach  will break the unhealthy connection between business
and the formation of public opinion. Content media will be free to
entertain us and to offer its tribune to writers and thinkers, without
needing to seek the approval of a media baron. This will restore
positive feedback between audience and media. Such  feedback once
allowed left-wing media to exist and prosper, but despite their great
number of copies in print, they eventually died out: – they could not
compete with the advertisement-carrying papers of the media moguls.
Thus, in Israel, left-wing Davar and Al Hamishmar succumbed while
barons’ papers Ha'aretz, Yediyot and Maariv survived. In England, the
only Left paper died out, though its circulation was four times bigger
than that of its competitors, because business did not want to give
its ads to it. So after the freedom of the media is achieved, we can
expect to read a greater variety of opinions, not only those vetted by
the rich.


Eventually advertising, and its PR variant, can be limited to such an
extent that not a single unwilling person will be exposed to the
temptation to consume, to buy, to rent, to get a loan, to sell or to
any other business-related activity.


This will signify a turn away from a society of consumers to a society
of producers. Almost all of us are producers AND consumers; but
nowadays our producing hypostasis is subservient to the consuming one.
Consumer-based media despise the producer. They speak neither of nor
to the honest worker; preferring instead to dwell on the conspicuous
consumption of a Paris Hilton. But we want to live in a society where
a Paris Hilton will be proud of her creative work, not of her ability
to eat, drink and suntan.


This would signify our turn from a nature-destroying society to a
society at peace with nature. If the stimulation of consumption
continues apace, we'll eat our planet up within one century, probably
less. By giving up growth we'll find homeostasis.


This will also signify a turn away from a Jewish-inspired to a
Christian-based society. Many critics of Jewish morals, of Jewish
influence and of Jewish predominance in media are happy just to point
out the disproportionate Jewish presence in this or other important
field of human activity. They offer no way out of this  but a crude
racialist replacement of Jews by Gentiles. This won’t do because
Gentile-owned media will copy-cat Jewish practices. It might be good
enough for racialist “whites” who eye some mythic genetic pool
advancement, however, we want more. We want the victory of the
Christian spirit, not that of “Christian” flesh because for us,
‘Jewish’ and ‘Christian’ are not racial but spiritual antonyms.


Is such a society possible? Absolutely. European and American society
became ensnarled by the advertising and consumption trap quite
recently, less than three hundred years ago. This process was
described by Werner Sombart, the German Marxist of early 20th century,
as “a struggle between two –  Jewish and Christian – outlooks, between
two radically differing — nay, opposite — views of economic life.” His
predecessor Max Weber had pointed out the Protestant roots of
capitalism. Sombart corrected Weber by noticing the Jewish influence
which formed real capitalism.


He saw early, pre-Jewish capitalism as basically Christian society
seeking fairness and harmony. In this Christian ethics-based society
all forms of advertising were forbidden, as they were considered
unfair. “Commodities were produced and bought and sold in order that
consumers might have their wants sufficiently satisfied. On the other
hand, producers and traders were to receive fair wages and fair
profits. What was fair, and what sufficient for your need, tradition
and custom determined. And so, producer and trader should receive as
much as was demanded by the standard of comfort in their station in
life.”


This is a far cry from today’s society where there is no connection at
all between the wages of the producer and the profit of a trader and
middleman. We now consider competition  benevolent, for we were told
that it is good for the consumer. But is it good for a producer whose
income is constantly undermined by competition? We pay less for an
appliance because of competition, but our wages are also pushed down
by competition, as our labour is also a sort of commodity. Immigration
creates a permanent downward push on our wages and an  upward push for
labour competition. In the most successful, solidarist and least
Judaised countries – Sweden and Japan – there is little if any
competition, whether for labour or for commodities. In pre-Jewish
European society competition was frowned upon. Traders did not
compete: they fixed prices and waited for customers.


“To take away your neighbour’s customers was contemptible,
unchristian, and immoral. A rule for “Merchants who trade in
commodities” was: “Turn no man’s customers away from him, either by
word of mouth or by letter, and do not to another what you would not
have another do to you.” In the 18th century, in the London of Defoe
and the Germany of Goethe, it was not considered proper for a
shopkeeper to “dress his window tastefully, to advertise his business
or to praise his wares… To praise your goods or to point out wherein
your business was superior to others was nefarious. But the last word
in commercial impropriety was to announce that your prices were lower
than those of the man opposite.”


Sombart concludes: “to make profit was looked upon by most people
throughout the period as improper, as 'unchristian'”. Jews did not
agree with such norms. To them, profit justified everything. “Jews
were never conscious of doing wrong, of being guilty of commercial
immorality. They were in the right; it was the other, Christian
outlook that was wrong and stupid in their eyes. The Jew is more of a
business-man than his neighbour; he recognizes, in the true
capitalistic spirit, the supremacy of gain over all other aims.”


“The Jewish claim to be the fathers of modern advertising is well
established. A very old advertisement in the United States — whether
the oldest I cannot say — appeared on August 17, 1761, in the New York
Mercury, as follows: “To be sold by Hayman Levy, in Bayard Street,
Camp Equipages of all sorts, best soldiers’ English shoes . . . and
everything that goes to make up the pomp and circumstance of glorious
war.” Finally, the Jews are the founders of the modern Press, i.e.,
the machinery for advertising, more especially of the cheap
newspapers.”


This was the end of free thought: only writers approved by wealthy
advertisers could be published. After a small Californian newspaper,
The Coastal Post, published my article in defence of President Carter,
there was a drive by Jewish organizations to stop the  flow of
advertising to the newspaper. In a short time, the newspaper was
forced to repent. Many writers were seduced into obedience. In that
short time, freedom of the press was conquered.


While stopping advertising, we should also stop hidden advertising.
Stock market reports are a form of advertising, for it mentions
certain companies and their products, and even worse, it attracts
people to gamble on shares and currencies. It would be good to get rid
of the stock markets completely, but as a first step, let us just
treat all information about the markets as advertising, making it
available only to those who actively seek it while protecting the
majority from exposure to it. Stock markets should be open just one
day a week, as is already the case in some countries, until the public
is weaned from frenetic “business activity”.



We may look with some nostalgia at the experience of the Soviet Union,
a utopia of little or no advertising, of producer-centered media. In
the Soviet Union, a nice girl like Paris Hilton would be deported to a
village one hundred miles away from the big city for re-education in a
factory or on a farm; she would not re-educate us and our children. A
Russian-made appliance could serve its owners for twenty to thirty
years. Soviet citizens were not pushed to consume. Instead, they were
called to work and to improve themselves by study. The lack of
sophistication of the Soviet elite eventually effected the collapse of
this utopia, but for the 18 years since its demise the residual
achievements of Soviet education in its universities, opera houses and
classic orchestras, in software-writing and in free thought still
empower and inspire the West.}