🚀 go-pugleaf

In a recent missive Wilde2@ix.netcom.com (Aesthete ) tells us:
*
*So, if you are of the caliber of an achiever of romance, please do drop
*me a line, though, if not I can recommend [snipe!] Gary Brainen or
*Brainless something like that. A limpet of a little wiseass who caters
*to philistine principals and servile natures; hence, a glossy critic
*with all the achievement of a popcorn 'B' movie huckster.


Lemme tell you something, putzo:  Gary Brainin is *far* more attractive
than the _pathetic_ (and I *do mean* _pathetic_) description in your 
ad (and that you *need* to post an ad..well..that just begs the
question...).

Aside from being an attractive man, he has a fabulous sense of humour,
a generally all around wonderful personality, and he's hella intelligent 
(the first of this list being the only thing you haven't already disproven 
about yourself with your post).


No no..don't take my word for it..let's examine the evidence:

>To begin with, I would like to state punctually that my desire is to
>find one person whom I can nurture a lifelong romance with. My ideal
>love does not have to be the GODDESS TYPE, only to effuse a soft
>lovliness which is so terribly hard to find anymore. Please be a person
>whom measures the quality of a commitment by the vastness of the
>character, and not by the lowness of the temptation of material

First, get thee to a copy of the Elements of Style immediately.  Then,
a good book on grammar, and figure out that who/whom thing.  And...
"state punctually"?   Am I the only one who wasn't *expecting* this
statement from you at this precise time...thus proving you punctual?
[Perhaps a good Webster's Unabridged to go with that Elements of Style?] 


>possessions, alas. However, if the goodness is there, so to speak,
>material possession can amount, though, only as an incidental

Amount?  AMOUNT?  Amount to *what*?  Amount to all you have to offer 
someone?  Don't forget a Roget's...use it to look up the synonyms for "amass".
[Hint:  "amount" ain't one of them.]


Hang it up, nimrod, even a woman unsophisticated enough to not see through
the laughable attempt at the "I am a nifty 90's thenthitive guy" facade
will still be intelligent enough to recognize the extremely weak
grasp on the language, let alone the syntax thereof.


-- 
   I am: mom, attorney, fathers' rights advocate, founder of F.R.E.E.(tm)
*--> Fathers' Rights & Equality Exchange info: http://www.vix.com/free/
    To join the Fathers' Rights & Equality Exchange:  free-join@vix.com
  LOOKING FOR:  Lorna Taylor, anyone from The Grammar School & Woolman Hill