🚀 go-pugleaf

Diesmal wurden auch FAQs gepl�ttet.

 Path: ...!uunet!in2.uu.net!faqcancel!senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!faqserv
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Aha.
 Control: cancel <european-union/basics/part1_847656841@rtfm.mit.edu>
 Message-ID: <cancel.european-union/basics/part1_847656841@rtfm.mit.edu>
 X-Cancelled-By: clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca
Gelogen.

 These cancels are issued as a service to the Internet providers not wishing
 to carry the frequently asked questions (FAQ) spam. Sites that do not wish
 to take advantage of this free service can easily can opt out of these
 cancels by "aliasing out" the faqcancel pseudosite.

Unnen Appel un' Ei aussem Konsum.

 Help protect our right to issue third-party cancels. Vote to stop the NCM
 proposal. Please e-mail this pre-filled ballot to voting@hut.fi today:

Tut's nicht, sondern findet den Orinalaufruf zu

 | 1ST CALL FOR VOTES: news.software.misc, news.lists reorganization
 | Official Usenet Voting Ballot <NLF-0001> (Do not remove this line!)

und w�hlt YES - falls ein solcher CFV tats�chlich in news.admin.newsgroups
gepostet wurde. Vgl. auch
--------------------------schnipp------------------
 Message-ID: <961115165134.33106.7141@ferret.ocunix.on.ca>
 Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.announce,news.admin.net-abuse.misc
 Date: 15 Nov 1996 16:51:34 EST
 From: clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca (Chris Lewis)
 Subject: Report: Forged cancels injected at UUNET.... AGAIN
...
 Like the last time, these cancels contained messages suggesting that
 they were legitimate thirdparty spam cancels, but clearly they are not.
 New this time was claims that they were from one of the legitimate
 spam cancellers - but examination of the path proves that they are not.
 Furthermore, these cancels attempted to promote vote fraud against the
 Usenet vote being held for the news.lists reorganization.

 Isn't it ironic that tale's own system is being used to subvert the
 voting process?
...
 A total of 8131 of these cancels were received here containing the
 following "tags":

  456 cripplecancel
  465 faqcancel
 2346 hombrecancel
 2127 mlkcancel
 1396 nazicancel
  208 porncancel
 1133 redneckcancel

 I reposted as many as I could find, less a few chain letters.  This
 totalled 3153.
--------------------------schnapp------------------
Beschwerden an help@uunet.uu.net. Vgl jedoch
 From: "Jim" <jwint@qis.net>
 Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
 Subject: Re: newsgroup spammers
 Date: 16 Nov 1996 13:35:09 GMT
 Message-ID: <01bbd3c3$4165e1a0$222972cf@jim-wint>
                                         ^^^^^^^^ 
(ARGH! M$ Internet News)
...
 UUNET Technologies appreciates your notifying us of a SPAM/MASSMAIL
 incident.

 The address for massmail complaints is abuse@uu.net, spam is
 spam-complaint@uu.net.

 Please note that if your concern is SPAM or MASSMAIL, we require the
 FULL header information in order to determine where the mail or SPAM
 originated.  Any queries without that information cannot be acted upon.
...

Evtl. sollte man auch tale@uunet.uu.net (David Lawrence) darauf
hinweisen, was vollkommen offene NNTP-Ports bedeuten in DM/Site mal
rund zweitausend Sites (nur *ruhr.de/*ping.de), die fast alle
pro Verbindungszeit zahlen. Die gecancelten Artikel sind n�mlich fast 
alle regepostet worden - und FAQs sind laaaaang.

Allerdings sind auch rogue cancels woanders als �ber UUNET eingespeist 
worden.


Ansonsten empfiehlt ein Wiederlesen des Threads, der mit 
 Date: 22 Sep 1996 20:20:00 +0200
 From: leo@dawn.ruhr.de (Christian Bullerdick)
 Newsgroups: backbone.fragen
 Message-ID: <6HNoANjepMB@dawn.ruhr.de>
 Subject: geekcancel pseudosite?
anfing. Daraus:

Ruhe bewahren, stabile Seitenlage einnehmen.
Immer ALLE ORIGINAL-HEADER posten.
End of Usenet predicted, see news at eleven.

[Followup-To: backbone.general]
-- 
Wolfgang Schelongowski  Check _all_ headers for sending email.

Teifi, Teifi, Sakradie, do geht er dahin!
  -- EAV, Alpenrap