Re: Ubiquity traffic BCNet/BCTel

Article View: bc.bcnet

Article #1310

#1310

From: James Dean
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 00:00

32 lines
1677 bytes

Sounds amazing to me.

Does BC Tel have a T3 link to California?

CIAO



In article <49rtr5$b8g@felix.junction.net>, michael@okjunc.junction.net says...
>
>In article <1995Nov30.111256@malad2.mala.bc.ca>,
>Malcolm Dunnett <dunnett@mala.bc.ca> wrote:
>>
>>A while ago there was a discussion about how BC Tel and BCNet don't
>>directly exchange packets for their Ubiquity based clients, and that 
>>traffic between such sites must pass through California. At the time
>>I believe someone from BCNet said that the situation was being worked
>>on and a solution was forthcoming.
>>
>>I notice that as of yet this situation hasn't changed. Does anyone
>>know if there has been any progress on this matter and/or when a
>>solution might be implemented?
>
>It would be nice if the solution was an exchange point for all networks 
>in Vancouver, i.e a NAP where BCNet, BC Tel, Sprint and any others would 
>exchange traffic.
>
>
>-- 
>Michael Dillon                                    Voice: +1-604-546-8022
>Memra Software Inc.                                 Fax: +1-604-542-4130
>http://www.memra.com                             E-mail: michael@memra.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4au2nr$eko@grid.direct.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <1995Nov30.111256@malad2.mala.bc.ca> <49rtr5$b8g@felix.junction.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 106393,9920afc21fc35745
X-Google-Attributes: gid106393,public
From: jdean@direct.ca (James Dean)
Subject: Re: Ubiquity traffic BCNet/BCTel
Date: 1995/12/16
Message-ID: <4au2nr$eko@grid.direct.ca>
X-Deja-AN: 122012862
references: <1995Nov30.111256@malad2.mala.bc.ca> <49rtr5$b8g@felix.junction.net>
content-type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
organization: The Zada Computer Group Inc.
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: bc.bcnet

Reply to Parent Message