Re: Lion's Gate Replacement

Article View: bc.cycling

Article #10347

#10347

From: Doug Chinnery
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 1995 00:00

13 lines
1189 bytes

In article <1995Nov7.012924.1507@instep.bc.ca>,  <brad@instep.bc.ca> wrote:
>Don't let the government fool us into thinking that a tunnel is a logical  
>alternative since the Lion's Gate will become the cycling/pedestrian  
>crossing. Future governments will not justify the up-keep of an old bridge  
>(painting, welding, etc) for the sake of this small percentage of users.

Ya gotta figure that upkeep on the bridge would be minimal if there
was only bikes, peds, and skaters on it.  It would be a really
unpopular decision to tear it down, to boot.
-- 
Doug Chinnery          doug@zadall.com       dtc@wimsey.com
"Sure I'll have another drink with you, though I'm already drunk as
a bottle" - The Jesus Lizard

Technical Details

Message-ID: <DHp92A.6L1@zadall.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <1995Nov7.012924.1507@instep.bc.ca>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fe616,ca8dd7457d88120c
X-Google-Attributes: gidfe616,public
From: doug@zadall.com (Doug Chinnery)
Subject: Re: Lion's Gate Replacement
Date: 1995/11/08
Message-ID: <DHp92A.6L1@zadall.com>
X-Deja-AN: 118847546
sender: news@zadall.com (The news programs owner)
references: <1995Nov7.012924.1507@instep.bc.ca>
organization: Zadall Systems Group, Inc., Burnaby BC, Canada
newsgroups: bc.cycling

Reply to Parent Message