🚀 go-pugleaf

The point was to point out I am no slouch when it comes to knowing the rules 
and I follow them pretty closely.  I hate lazy, stupid drivers who think 
they own you when it is actually the reverse when you look at who pays for 
what.
Glad we could clear that up at the 5th try. : )

"smn" <yellowsubmarine@telusnospam.net> wrote in message 
news:wo%fg.7879$S61.2171@edtnps90...
> Well, I do not drive a car so your answer is mute.
> I have licenses for jobs I quit years ago.
>
> "DiscoDuck" <fornewsgroups@shaw.ca> wrote in message 
> news:1149270687.869214.325320@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> smn wrote:
>>
>>> Like I tried to point out before but you got defensive about it and told 
>>> me
>>> I should wear a helmut in a car in Surrey.  The argument is not held up 
>>> by
>>> the facts.  Helmuts in cars for children I would consider.
>>
>> Defensive?  Not at all.  Just wanted to clarify what you meant since
>> you were unclear as you simply stated
>> "Too many stupid drivers on the road for me to feel safe enough without
>> a helmut.  I have class 4, 5, and 6 licences by the way and have been
>> riding since I was 8. "
>> No, No., helmets for all.  IT would save lives and money.  Just using
>> the same argument used for bicycle helmets.  Why would you only mandate
>> helmets for kids in cars?
>> So why take a chance in a car, if you don't on a bike?  Don't get me
>> wrong, I think you should have the choice as you do with cars now.  No
>> law prohibits you from wearing in in a car.
>>
>
>