🚀 go-pugleaf

Steve Horne wrote:
> 
> 3 key reasons for the plunge in the polls for idiot Harpo:
> 1: He screwed the seniors in his budget, and not all seniors are
> senile.

Traditionally, all politicians/governments take shots or mess with 
legislation to do with seniors.

> 
> 2. Canadians are sick of the body bags bringing home Canadians
> killed to satisfy the blood lust of Israel and the US warmongers!!

I have not heard one person of any age mention Iraq, Afiganistan, death 
body bags or anything remotely close.  They talk about men, women, sex
television, beer, clothing, hair, vacations, weekends, new cars, money,
lack of money, children, babies, teenagers, office gossip, getting a
better job, wanting to work closer to home, wanting more money, wanting
to retire.  

> 
> 3. Harpo's support for the Israeli terrorist regime
> 
> Another 4 killed for Israel and US should cause Harpo's rating to
> plummet even faster!
> 
> How many more getting killed today, and tomorrow, and....
>

People have been getting killed in Israel since the beginning of time.
Not sure that I heard anyone ever speak about it in Canada other than
what I read in the newspapers and appears on television. 
 
> >On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 10:44:23 -0700, Brian Daily
> ><daily.brian@gmail.com.nomaps> wrote:
> >>On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:39:15 GMT, Chom Noamsky <e@t.me> wrote:
> 
> >>>The latest Decima poll has the Liberals and Tories tied.  This is a strong
> >>>indication that Canadians want Canada to have foreign policy that is
> >>>independent of the United States.  The Tory strategy of improving relations
> >>>with the US by unconditional, uncritical, and unquestioning support is
> >>>backfiring.  There is no other way to explain the sudden drop in
> >>>popularity.
> 
> >>Harper is tied with a LEADERLESS Liberal party. It's believed a leader, ANY
> >>leader is worth 5-10 points in the polls.
> >>This means a Liberal majority government in the next election is almost
> >>guaranteed. :)
> >>This is great news for Canada!
> 
> >>>Canadians want independent foreign policy, not policy that revolves around
> >>>appeasing America for the sole purpose of improving trade relations.
> 
> >>>http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=b9c135c2-35ed-4360-a704-1bf10b8180f5&k=89927