🚀 go-pugleaf

You're not vewy bwight, are you woger?





"Roger" <roger@.> wrote in message 
news:jrmt225n0jtom6q3ohgqsmds3est2njbib@4ax.com...
> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>   (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>      someone claiming to be ataturkey wrote
>         in message
> <1143917549.725435.24700@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>:
>
>>Roger wrote:
>
>>> >> >> >> >> No, the shame is that I don't think you even realize that 
>>> >> >> >> >> your lie
>>> >> >> >> >> that "it goes on on both sides" is exactly that.
>
>>> >> >> >> >I know for a fact that your side does call people from pay 
>>> >> >> >> >phones to
>>> >> >> >> >harass the families of those your side does not agree with.
>
>>> >> >> >> And your proof that anyone here has done this is ... ?
>
>>> >> >> >"Nazihunter" was recently exposed for doing exactly that.
>
>>> >> >> And by that act, demonstrated that zie was *not* on "my side."
>
>>> >> >He was harassing those who disagreed with the propaganda put out by
>>> >> >your side.
>
>>> >> My side does not put out propaganda -- and that he targeted deniers
>>> >> does not make him on "my side."
>
> "turkey" refuses to engage on this issue.
>
>>> >> >> And the identity of "nazihunter" has never been determined.
>
>>> >> >He was recently exposed.
>
>>> >> As several different people, if one were to believe your source.
>
>>> But "turkey" doesn't want to talk about *that*.
>
> Run, "turkey" -- run.
>
>>> >> >He is making his obscene and threatening calls from Canada.
>
>>> >> Ah, so all of Canada is not only "nazihunter" and on "my side?"
>
> Well?
>
>>> >> >> When those posts were being made, "my side" routinely condemned 
>>> >> >> them
>>> >> >> -- can you point to any such from deniers about these "lisa"
>>> >> >> forgeries?
>
>>> >> >I think that these "lisa" posts are disgusting and so is 
>>> >> >"nazihunter".
>
>>> >> Okay.  *One*. *And* it took my prodding to make you do it.
>
>>> >No prodding was ever required. I condemn and condemned unprincipled,
>>> >cowardly conduct regardless of which sides is responsible for it.
>
>>> ... all evidence to the contrary:
>>>
>>> Not a peep out of you regarding the Nizkor phonebook.
>>>
>>> Not a peep out of you regarding those forgeries about Sara.
>>>
>>> And not a peep out of you regarding the "lisa" forgeries when they
>>> first started appearing this round.
>>>
>>> You're a liar, and a hypocrite, not that this is news.
>
>>Comments like this tells volumes about you, nothing about your intended
>>target.
>
> That I pay attention and point out your lies?
>
> It says exactly that:  your claim that you "condemned unprincipled,
> cowardly conduct regardless of which sides is responsible for it" is a
> lame attempt at revisionizing your own posting history.
>
> Or is it your contention that such posts are principled and brave when
> directed against Sara, mcvay, or any of the people listed in the
> Nizkor phonebook?
>
>>> >> >There are only a handful of people on these lists who are able to
>>> >> >handle differences of opinions without name calling. The only one 
>>> >> >who
>>> >> >comes to mind is Al Smith.
>
>>> >> LOL -- riiiiiiiiiight.
>
>>> >Al Smith does not post often
>
>>> If ~ 12 posts a day, just in alt.rev is "not often" I guess.
>
> Splattered again, hmmmn "turkey?"
>
>>> >and tries (no one is totally unbiased) to
>>> >be unbiased with his opinions
>
>>> Bullsh*t.
>
>>> >and does not resort to name calling.
>
>>> Demonstrably wrong.
>
>>> >I cannot think of anyone else who comes even close.
>
>>> And your inability to think is significant ... how?
>
>>> >> >There could be one or two others.
>
>>> >> >> >> >It is a
>>> >> >> >> >disgusting and cowardly thing to do and is the main cause of 
>>> >> >> >> >people no
>>> >> >> >> >longer posting under their real names. You should be ashamed 
>>> >> >> >> >for
>>> >> >> >> >shameful conduct of your side just as the other side should be 
>>> >> >> >> >ashamed
>>> >> >> >> >for the shameful conduct of their side.