🚀 go-pugleaf

"Beaver Cleaver" <beaver_cleaver@mayfield.net> wrote in message 
news:q5d7n19ssql5a18unmh2gkdopmr07mo4sr@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:11:42 -0500,
> <Ouq9f.2747$J14.126603@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan" 
> <test@dev.null>
> wrote:
>
>>"Lisa McVay-Henske" <unlisted@unknown.net> wrote in message
>>news:cd58ca2a15c012025135b1a09d1aa56d@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
>>> My father is the director of The Nizkor Project based in Nanaimo,
>>
>>No, he isn't,
>
> So you are saying Kenneth McVay is NOT the director of The Nizkor Project?

Could you at least try to not *appear* so stupid, Mr. Bradbury?

The poster's father is not Ken McVay, and is lying.

>>and if this were true, you wouldn't be posting anonymously.
>
> Perhaps she doesn't want to be hunted down and harassed!

It's *much* more likely that you are hallucinating.

The poster is using an anonymous account to avoid taking responsibilities 
for their actions.

> Just look what was done
> to me by unscrupulous Jews who abused the legal system.

It's always about *you*, isn't it, Mr. Bradbury?

>  I don't blame Lisa for
> wanting to hide from McVay.

What makes you think the poster is a person named Lisa?

If this person were in fact the victim of sexual abuse, this is one of the 
easiest things to seek legal redress for.   It's perhaps *the* most 
vigorously prosecuted crime, and it doesn't matter who the person is or was.

Why is it you are so eager to promote obvious forgeries, Mr. Bradbury?

>
>>You'd have gone to the police.
>
> What makes you think she hasn't?

This should be easy for even you to figure out.

Child sexual abuse is vigorously prosecuted in Canada and the United States, 
with both the legal system and media taking a great interest.

No charges have been filed, no investigation has been opened, and the poster 
has chosen to use an anonymous account rather than approach the legal system 
or the media - both of which have been shown to work *very* well in 
producing legal action.

It is obvious that the poster is not the person they claim to be, that the 
events claimed did not occur, and the poster is simply trying to avoid being 
prosecuted for making  false claims.

But here you are, trying to use an obvious forgery for your own ends.

How suspicious - and how typical of you.


>>You haven't done so, and won't do so, because not only are you not the
>>person claimed, you know that what was posted is simply false.
>>
>>What a great example of the strength of the "revisionist" position.
>
> As I have proven some of these posts are originating from your side!

Which means that most don't.   And here you are, lapping this one up.

Why is it you are so eager to promote obvious forgeries, Mr. Bradbury?

-pk

<snip crap>