🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: bc.general
Article #63119

Re: Population Statistics

#63119
From: David Reilley
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 1995 00:00
21 lines
1335 bytes
In article <47scai$mjc@wolfe.wimsey.com> ufischer@fdva.com (Ullrich Fischer) writes:
>From: ufischer@fdva.com (Ullrich Fischer)
>Subject: Population Statistics
>Date: Thu, 09 Nov 1995 07:57:24 GMT

>In today's Vancouver SUN, there was an article which claimed that the
>single Canadian male population in the 24-34 year old range
>outnumbered the single  female population in that age range  by about
>20%, and that this was leading to a return to traditional family
>values.

<snip>

>If these demographic assertions are, in fact, true, what the heck happened 
>to all these women?  <snip>  Has the birth rate of females dropped relative 
>to that of males?  

This is nothing new.  The "missing" women in that age group are not missing, 
they are married to older men.  In ten years some of the men in who are now 24 
- 34 will be marrying younger women, and this will create a similar "surplus" 
in the next generation of young men.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <dreilley.903.0B44E559@pinc.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <47scai$mjc@wolfe.wimsey.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,eed155c8ece24b8f
X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public
From: dreilley@pinc.com (David Reilley)
Subject: Re: Population Statistics
Date: 1995/11/09
Message-ID: <dreilley.903.0B44E559@pinc.com>
X-Deja-AN: 118983364
references: <47scai$mjc@wolfe.wimsey.com>
organization: Integrate
newsgroups: bc.general