Article View: bc.general
Article #63119Re: Population Statistics
From: David Reilley
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 1995 00:00
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 1995 00:00
21 lines
1335 bytes
1335 bytes
In article <47scai$mjc@wolfe.wimsey.com> ufischer@fdva.com (Ullrich Fischer) writes: >From: ufischer@fdva.com (Ullrich Fischer) >Subject: Population Statistics >Date: Thu, 09 Nov 1995 07:57:24 GMT >In today's Vancouver SUN, there was an article which claimed that the >single Canadian male population in the 24-34 year old range >outnumbered the single female population in that age range by about >20%, and that this was leading to a return to traditional family >values. <snip> >If these demographic assertions are, in fact, true, what the heck happened >to all these women? <snip> Has the birth rate of females dropped relative >to that of males? This is nothing new. The "missing" women in that age group are not missing, they are married to older men. In ten years some of the men in who are now 24 - 34 will be marrying younger women, and this will create a similar "surplus" in the next generation of young men.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<dreilley.903.0B44E559@pinc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<47scai$mjc@wolfe.wimsey.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,eed155c8ece24b8f X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public From: dreilley@pinc.com (David Reilley) Subject: Re: Population Statistics Date: 1995/11/09 Message-ID: <dreilley.903.0B44E559@pinc.com> X-Deja-AN: 118983364 references: <47scai$mjc@wolfe.wimsey.com> organization: Integrate newsgroups: bc.general