Article View: bc.general
Article #63165Re: Consumer Alert: Internet Direct
From: Stuart Lynne
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 00:00
42 lines
2947 bytes
2947 bytes
In article <47uhoj$p8b@vanbc.wimsey.com>, <vanepp@vanbc.wimsey.com> wrote: >"D. Cartwright" <dcartwri@Express.CA> writes: >account to phone line ratios and/or "unlimited" not being unlimited. There >are a number of providers around that believe in charging the customer for >what they use (which of course drives the heavy users to the "unlimited" >places ...). ISP's are kind of like restaurants. If you have the only restaurant in town and you decided to that you would offer a smorgasboard for $19.95 (including desert and coffee) you would probably do ok. It's not too unreasonably high and if there is no competition then even people who don't eat too much will eat there. You just balance the costs so that on average your cost of providing the food is less than that. Now if someone else opens up accross the street and makes their menu a la carte you may have a problem. All those people on diets, or people who think that the quality of your food is too low may choose to go over there and pay only for what they eat (saving money) or pay more and get better quality. The only problem is now you have fewer people, and all the people left are the big eaters. Before they balanced out with the people who didn't eat much. But the light eaters left because they are getting a better deal across the street. So you have two options. Either reduce the quality of your food even farther or raise prices so that the heavy eaters are paying for what they use. The moral is that when you have multiple billing options, users will gradually migrate to the one that costs them the least. In the above case and in the case of ISP's this means that heavy users will graduate to plans that promise a flat price for large amounts of time and light users will graduate to plans where they pay only for what the need and want. An interesting side effect of this is that the users and providers of the flat rate service generally are not happy. The original plan was to have the light users subsidize the heavy users but now that they have left the ISP can't continue to provide the same level of service. On the other hand the light users and their ISP are happy because the one is paying only for what they need and the other is not loosing his shirt providing it. -- Stuart Lynne <sl@wimsey.com> 604-933-1000 <http://www.wimsey.com> PGP Fingerprint: 28 E2 A0 15 99 62 9A 00 88 EC A3 EE 2D 1C 15 68
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<47urvk$sgp@wolfe.wimsey.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<45amku$riq@news.infoserve.net> <47s5t9$5n0@vanbc.wimsey.com> <30A23C19.31B4@Express.CA> <47uhoj$p8b@vanbc.wimsey.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,c81de9d6f30b2733 X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public From: sl@whiskey.wimsey.com (Stuart Lynne) Subject: Re: Consumer Alert: Internet Direct Date: 1995/11/10 Message-ID: <47urvk$sgp@wolfe.wimsey.com> X-Deja-AN: 119349495 references: <45amku$riq@news.infoserve.net> <47s5t9$5n0@vanbc.wimsey.com> <30A23C19.31B4@Express.CA> <47uhoj$p8b@vanbc.wimsey.com> organization: Total Lack Thereof newsgroups: bc.general