🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <47o2eg$cgc@wolfe.wimsey.com>, kpollak@portal.ca (Karl Pollak)
writes:
>
> ds>To claim that the press release answers the question of how the
> Campbell
> ds>Liberals would handle the Nisga'a negotiations is like asking someone
> the
> ds>colour of an orange and getting the answer hot, i.e.
>
> Was anyone speaking of any specific negotiations?  This stuff is intended
> to set the framework for all negotiations with the native people.


Only some guy by the name of Gordon Campbell.  We were talking about his
comments last Friday in reaction to an anticipated offer to the Nisga'a.


>
> Above all it is a promise to open up the process sufficiently so that the
> government does not get stuck in "us" vs "them" type of backlash from the
> rest of the voters like the NDP.  Your government is making deals behind
> the closed doors and that is making a lot of non-native people extremely
> nervous.


You are evading the question, Karl, just like Campbell.  The situation is
how to deal with negotions ordered by the court under the terms of a
secreacy agreement entered into by former Socred minister Weisgerber.
We've opened negotions to the point that some sessions are carried on local
cable stations, but there are limitations in this case thanks to Jack.  So
what is Campbell's real position when dealing with a real situation?

>
> ds>Whatever they are considering on Nov. 18th must be so
> ds>hot that Karl won't post it here ......
>
> Trolling, trolling and no bites ....  damn !  :-)
> You are soooo  transparent ...


Isn't it fun to watch Karl's knee jerk?

--David
--
David_Schreck@mindlink.bc.ca  or  Schreck@Wimsey.com
res 984-8344 NVof 986-2254 VicOf 356-3003
(MLA - North Vancouver Lonsdale)  "Compare between shared ideals but
                                  choose between real alternatives"