🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <Pine.SGI.3.91.951106181137.26440J-100000@fraser>, Christian Johannes Bichler <cbichler@sfu.ca> says:
>
>this is the new message, the preamble was just so y'all knew what is 
>going on:

[yeah, yeah, yeah]

>
>You know it is incredible to listen to this arguement, seeing as it is 
>two extreme sides talking.  Put away your genital memory banks boys, 
>neither of you has the bigger one.  While I strongly agree that equal 
>rights is a good initiative, let us not be blind in believing that it is 
>fully implemented.  If it where, then regardless of SEX, both males and 
>females would be making the same wage.

And they do, if they perform the same amoutn of the same work.

>Gee, was it just here in CANADA 
>that they discovered (cough, cough) that men make more than women?

By whose criteria??? The study was done by a extreme left wing branch of
the UN. The study was developed in the late '70s/early '80s with the 'assistance'
of the personnel of the Soviet mission to the UN. It was supposed to offer
some face-saving arguments in face of the fact that the economies of the
West, even those of the so-called social-democracies, were doing so much
better, and providing so much more to their people, than those of the 
'peoples paradise'. The criteria used in scoring were straight of the list
of Marxist nonsense about 'equal pay for work of equal value' ????; the 
level of income redistribution - how much is stolen from those who work for
a living and given to those who do not; the level of quota-driven 'equality'
within job categories; etc.

> But I 
>forgot, we are the one's with this so-called Equality Bill.  Still 
>believe in the Tooth-Fairy?  Nah, but I bet you believe in Future Shop's 
>price protection plan!!??!!  

So-called is right. This piece of garbage has nothing to do with equality.
It is the most nefarious piece of legislation since the South African
population identification laws.

>
>By the way, why is it always a "NAZI-STYLE" approach?  Is this your 
>narrow view of history?  Lets pause for a moment and consider all those 
>other "holier than thou" countries that have never committed crimes 
>against humanity.  Hmmmm....the States and the enslavement of blacks...oh 
>and those lovely governors of good ol' southern hospitaliy, the 
>KKK...Canada and the internment of the Japanese during WWII, can ya say 
>"flinch" boys?...How about something a little more recent, say the ethnic 
>cleansing in the former Republic of Yugoslavia?...
>

So you're saying we should call it 'Nazi-style'. OK would KKK-style be
alright? How about race and gender-clensing style? I have no problem with
any of those names. Nazi-style is a short-hand. It is clearly understandable
to all people, even with limited mental capabilites (hint, hint), because
of the universal knowlege of Nazi policies.



derek n, RdNck, Pen-Arm of the Righteous, esq.
- member in good standing: Homo Sapiens Interregnum (Caucasian persuasion)
- Sirs, I am no petty noble; an ancestor of mine by the name of Noah
  was once the commanding admiral of the combined fleets of my planet.
  (with apologies to Paul Anderson)
********************* MY OTHER COMPUTER IS A LAP-TOP ********************