🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mon, 06 Nov 95 14:08:40 -0800, David_Schreck@mindlink.bc.ca (David
Schreck) wrote:

>.........................................................  The press
>release doesn't tell us anything about how the Campbell Liberals would deal
>with negotiations.  Whatever they are considering on Nov. 18th must be so
>hot that Karl won't post it here but I won't hold my breath about it being
>any more realistic or relevant to what any government must consider.  The
>answer is like the Campbell Liberal economic policy - it just doesn't add
>up.
===========================================================
I am trying to remember a situation in Canada where a governing party,
with one year left in its mandate is already acting like an opposition
"wanabee".  Is it possible that there is serious fears in the
socialist ranks that even this may only be a dream.
David and others forget that many elections in BC have been won as a
result of the negative vote.  ie: many people don't really care what
the other party's policies are until they are in power.  That is the
only reason the NDP won the last time.  A result of a very significant
disenchantment with the Socreds.
So, you can attempt to attack the Liberals all you want but IMHO it is
not going to help one bit.
John Corman    ****** jcorman@island.net