Article View: bc.general
Article #63318Re: Schreck and Premier Harcourt
From: sandy
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 1995 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 1995 00:00
29 lines
1230 bytes
1230 bytes
David Schreck <schreck@wimsey.com> wrote: In response to CW. Edge opinion that >>Harcourt was ticked and Schreck ran for cover. DS: >Even Karl has acknowledged that it is incorrect to characterize my role >that way. David, you must be desperate to use Karl as a shield. Be that as it may, you still have NOT answered the question I post to you in this thread asking for your clarification on the "challenge" of Harcourt's leadership. > the repetition of lies here does not help anyone's credibility. GOOD advice ! Anybody got Harcourt's or Cull's email address for me to forward this piece of wisdom to ? They sure can use it, don't they ? sandy +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Delusion is the opiate of socialists.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<47gv6h$mtb@wolfe.wimsey.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3388150898@viking.mpr.ca> <815365574@f47.n340.z1.ftn> <47gq3s$gr5@wolfe.wimsey.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,62b9640bd8f5e646 X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public From: sandyl@wimsey.com (sandy) Subject: Re: Schreck and Premier Harcourt Date: 1995/11/05 Message-ID: <47gv6h$mtb@wolfe.wimsey.com> X-Deja-AN: 118637384 references: <3388150898@viking.mpr.ca> <815365574@f47.n340.z1.ftn> <47gq3s$gr5@wolfe.wimsey.com> organization: Online at Wimsey reply-to: sandyl@wimsey.com newsgroups: bc.general