Re: No to distinct society for Quebec

Article View: bc.general

Article #63326

#63326

From: Karl Pollak
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 1995 00:00

16 lines
1097 bytes

"Ronald J. Ellis" <ron@freenet.mb.ca> wrote:

>The Charlottetown Accord was defeated largely because it threatened to 
>grant Quebec Distinct Society status! We are all distinct.  To grant 

It was rejected in Quebec by a 60%+ vote.  So I guess there must have been
all sorts of other reasons why it did not go through.

In my view, the Sharlatan Accord referendum was mostly a Mulroney
referendum.  Do we want that kind of a person leading the country? ... and
the people have spoken ...

Karl Pollak
Bottom Line Productions           Canadian Infomaticon BBS,
Richmond, British Columbia        Fido 1:153/965  (604) 275-9579

Technical Details

Message-ID: <479e2l$9m0@wolfe.wimsey.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <4744gh$fb8@ionews.io.org> <Pine.SUN.3.91.951101094158.12348B-100000@winnie.freenet.mb.ca>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,82a1b1316ab0d52f
X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public
From: kpollak@portal.ca (Karl Pollak)
Subject: Re: No to distinct society for Quebec
Date: 1995/11/02
Message-ID: <479e2l$9m0@wolfe.wimsey.com>
X-Deja-AN: 118451681
references: <4744gh$fb8@ionews.io.org> <Pine.SUN.3.91.951101094158.12348B-100000@winnie.freenet.mb.ca>
organization: Online at Wimsey
newsgroups: bc.general

Reply to Parent Message