🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <409435$hvu@decaxp.harvard.edu>,
Richard Osterberg <osterber@scws40.harvard.edu> wrote:
>: 2) Application server:  If you have a client running an app from an
>: application server you have to buy a copy of the app, which has always
>: been valid and true, but the CONCURRENT statement will be gone.
>
>: i.e. If you have an icon pointing to the AppServer you need to pay.
>: The software licensing control software that saves you tones of money
>: won't be legal anymore.
>
>This sounds like bullshit.  What if you have an icon pointing to a 
>program that loads the software for you?  What if you have an icon 
>pointing to the network that points to a program that loads it for you?  
>What if I have an icon that opens up a DOS box that I run a batch file 
>that loads the program?  What if I have an icon for a DOS box where I 
>just type in the name of the software.  There's no way this rule can be 
>made consistent.
>
>-Rick
>
>--
>+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>|                 Rick Osterberg   osterber@fas.harvard.edu                |
>+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+

But the bottom line is, no matter how, you are still using the software.

That's at least what the lawyers think.
-- 
 +-----------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
 | ********* |   Kenneth S. Chiu             Internet: kschiu@zadall.com   |
 | **   ***  |                                                             |
 |    ***    |   Zadall Systems Group, Inc.                                |
 |  ***   ** |   4400 Dominion Street, 5th Floor                           |
 | ********* |   Burnaby, BC, Canada V5G 4G3                               |
 +-----------+-------------------------------------------------------------+