🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <DOCONNOR.Jan27721@sedona.intel.com>, doconnor@sedona.intel.com (Dennis O'Connor -FT-~) says:
>
>
>mechler@cs.ubc.ca (Roland Mechler) writes:
>] In article <>, doconnor@sedona.intel.com (Dennis O'Connor -FT-~) writes:
>] |> mechler@cs.ubc.ca (Roland Mechler) writes:
>] |> ] In article <3fn1j4$el1@bcarh8ab.bnr.ca>, mnowosel@bmerh9ca.bnr.ca (Michael Nowoselski) writes:
>] |> ] |> In article <3fmjj2$ne9@cs.ubc.ca>, mechler@cs.ubc.ca (Roland Mechler) writes:
>] |> ] |> |> In article <3fm9t2$ojv@bcarh8ab.bnr.ca>, glasgow@bnr.ca (Barry Glasgow) writes:
>] |> ] |> |> |> gun control does not remove guns from criminals,
>] |> ] |> |> |> gun control removes guns from people who obey the law,
>] |> ] |> |> |> criminals prefer unarmed victims.
>] |> ] |> |> 
>] |> ] |> |> Criminals may also feel there is a greater need to arm themselves if they 
>] |> ] |> |> think their victims are likely to be armed. They might even shoot first
>] |> ] |> |> and ask questions later.
>] |> ]
>] |> ] Please note that I stated this as being a *possibility*.
>] |> 
>] |> So are meteor strikes. Do you think it is appropriate to bring them
>] |> up WRT to building codes ?  No ?  Then why is your fantasy appropriate
>] |> to bring up in this discusion ?
>]
>] Welcome to Canada, Dennis! Good to see illogic knows no boundaries. :-)
>
>That's a pathetic dodge.  Answer the question. Should hypothetical 
>situations that seem to never or only rarely occur in real life be 
>the basis of decisions about public policy or laws ?
>--
>Dennis O'Connor                          doconnor@sedona.intel.com
>i960(R) Microprocessor Division          Not an Intel spokesman.
>
Could you in future limit you cross - posting to the relevent groups
(see above), and try to reply to a single thread - instead of creating
new ones with each posting - it's getting increasingly annoying wading
through your going - no-where - fast discuusions on every newsgroup I read

thanks

---
dwalker@island.net