Article View: bc.general
Article #63606Saving Trees = More Jobs
From: Kim Goldberg
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 06:32
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 06:32
89 lines
5118 bytes
5118 bytes
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Retransmit Freely in Cyberspace | Author Holds Standard Copyright
Originally published in The Nanaimo Times
November 8, 1994, page A5
Author: Kim Goldberg (kimg@efn.org)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HAVING BOTH
Oregon is booming, thanks to spotted owl,
but B.C.'s biggest newspaper turns a blind eye
(c) Kim Goldberg, 1994
The most significant land use decisions in British Columbia
(decisions euphemistically termed "compromises" despite the fact
that the only thing compromised is ecological integrity and
sustainability) have all been justified with the jobs-versus-
trees argument. As though we can't have both. As though we must
choose between economic stability and irreplaceable old growth
forests.
The jobs-versus-trees argument has been bogus from the
outset, manufactured by timber companies and their high-priced
spin doctors, and preying on the fears of working people in
resource-dependent towns.
Unfortunately for the companies, their favorite myth was
detonated last month in a front page story in the New York
Times describing Oregon's economic boom three years after U.S.
courts drastically curtailed old growth logging to protect the
northern spotted owl.
"Economic calamity has never looked so good," the Oct. 11
article states.
The logging industry predicted 100,000 Oregon jobs would
be sacrificied to the spotted owl ruling. In fact, the state
has added 100,000 jobs to its growing economy in the last year
alone, and the state may soon face a labor shortage.
Still the top timber-producing state in the U.S., Oregon
posted its lowest unemployement rate in a generation this
year - a mere 5 percent.
Timber workers are being retrained, and while the number
of logging jobs has fallen, the average wage in Oregon has
risen.
Ninety percent of retrained woodworkers are finding work
immediately, and at an average wage of just $1 an hour less
than the average timber industry job.
Even more importantly, these retrained workers say "the
world has opened up" to them through their new careers.
"I was brain-dead at the mill," says one man, who
retrained for community service work.
Even the most timber-dependent towns in southern Oregon
report rising property values and a net increase in jobs, the
NY Times article states.
If you missed these stunning revelations, you're not
alone.
The Vancouver Sun, B.C.'s largest and most influential
news outlet, did its darndest to prevent British Columbians
from learning the truth.
The Sun, you may recall, is that bastion of crusading
journalism that cut its environment-related beats from five to
one, axed David Suzuki's column, spent much of 1991 and 1992
genuflecting at the feet of timber barons, and yanked the
forestry reporter off his beat when he exposed the
unflattering history of the timber industry's P.R. firm,
Burson Marsteller.
So how did the Sun deal with the startling news that there
is indeed life, in fact economic vigor, after environmental
protection?
Did they give it 34 inches and two graphics starting on
page one as the NY Times had? Did they assign their own
reporter to examine the parallels between B.C. and Oregon?
Did they launch a series investigating the accuracy and real
agenda behind the jobs-versus-trees mantra chanted incessantly
by industry and government?
No. The Sun pulled the NY Times story off the wire,
hacked it down to ten inches, buried it mid-way down page A17
and skipped the graphics to make it as visually insignificant
as possible.
As Salman Rushdie wrote in his novel, Shame: "There are
things that cannot be said. No, it's more than that; there
are things that cannot be permitted to be true."
Thanks, Sun, for continuing to bring us all the news that
fits.
- 30 -
Kim Goldberg is a Nanaimo Times columnist.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Cznou3.AG1@freenet.carleton.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!at491Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1246dd,e27ba818171c0ab6,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1246dd,public X-Google-Thread: fb58e,e27ba818171c0ab6,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfb58e,public X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,e27ba818171c0ab6,start X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-22 02:34:19 PST Newsgroups: bc.general,talk.environment,ncf.environment Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!nott!cunews!freenet.carleton.ca!FreeNet.Carleton.CA!at491 From: at491@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Kim Goldberg) Subject: Saving Trees = More Jobs Message-ID: <Cznou3.AG1@freenet.carleton.ca> Sender: at491@freenet.carleton.ca (Kim Goldberg) Reply-To: at491@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Kim Goldberg) Organization: The National Capital FreeNet Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 06:32:27 GMT Lines: 89