Article View: bc.general
Article #63629Re: Gun FACTS
From: John Bartol
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 1994 21:13
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 1994 21:13
30 lines
2713 bytes
2713 bytes
I swore over and over that I wouldn't get involved in 2 threads (both of which have been spawned over the bc doctor shooting: abortion and gun control But one thing I keep seeing in *this* debate is people saying "I have guns and I am not going to use them for illegal purposes". I don't think anyone will dispute this. However, I have one question: what happens if someone takes your firearm(s) and uses them for illegal purposes? Okay, let's say there are, oh, 30,000 firearms in Canada. Wait, let's say there are 30,000,000 firearms in Canada (I know, silly number but I have a point to make :-) Now, some twit breaks in to your house and steals a weapon (yes, mags are to be kept separate from the weapon, etc., etc., but people can be careless). S/He then uses it and kills someone. Is that reasonable? If we got ridiculous and got rid of *every* firearm in the country, would it stop the use of firearms in crimes in this country? Of course not. If someone wants one bad enough, they will get it from somewhere else. The point of gun control is *control*, not necessarily outright banning of weapons. People will still kill each other with firearms, people will still kill themselves, people will still use them in crimes. But if the total availability of weapons is reduced, then it makes it more difficult. *And* the casual use of firearms in crimes will be reduced (the available stock of illicit weaponry would be more expensive and harder to get hold of). *I* don't think guns are very sporting. But others do and I can respect that.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<CzDpML.L6L@zadall.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!rutgers!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!hookup!cato.Direct.CA!vanbc.wimsey.com!zadallv!jbartReferences:
<rsutc-1411941532030001@nsc189t100.twu.ca> <qgiuVc3w165w@aroga.wimsey.com> <1994Nov16.040333.18533@cs.sfu.ca> <3ack1r$52r@canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,ceef072af7f91422 X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public X-Google-Thread: fb1ea,ceef072af7f91422 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1ea,public X-Google-Thread: 1044e7,ceef072af7f91422 X-Google-Attributes: gid1044e7,public X-Google-Thread: fb374,ceef072af7f91422 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb374,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-16 20:28:56 PST Newsgroups: bc.general,can.legal,can.politics,talk.politics.guns Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!rutgers!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!hookup!cato.Direct.CA!vanbc.wimsey.com!zadallv!jbart From: jbart@zadall.com (John Bartol) Subject: Re: Gun FACTS Organization: Zadall Systems Group, Inc., Burnaby BC, Canada Date: Wed, 16 Nov 1994 21:13:30 GMT Message-ID: <CzDpML.L6L@zadall.com> References: <rsutc-1411941532030001@nsc189t100.twu.ca> <qgiuVc3w165w@aroga.wimsey.com> <1994Nov16.040333.18533@cs.sfu.ca> <3ack1r$52r@canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca> Sender: news@zadall.com (The news programs owner) Nntp-Posting-Host: jbartol.vancouver.zadall.com Lines: 31