Article View: bc.general
Article #63634Re: Gun FACTS
From: Melanie Arabsky
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 1994 08:16
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 1994 08:16
34 lines
2766 bytes
2766 bytes
<snip> >If I am facing an intruder, I don't want him to have >a sporting chance. I want the upper hand. If he's got a gun and I don't, >that's not very sporting either. Ok - there's a can of worms. Any real stats on how many guns are *actually* used in legit self-defense?? I would especially like to stack that number up next to how many accidental deaths attributed to guns (I would both include and exclude deaths caused intentionally for other comparisons). For my purposes I would like to consider handguns only (so people protecting themselves or livestock against wild animals don't count here - unless they are doing it with a handgun). The reason I am curious is that I seriously suspect some people who claim to have guns 'for self defense' would be more honest if they just said 'I like them, I feel good owning one, I like to use it'. I am not saying these latter reasons for owning a gun are invalid. And this is just my guess - maybe I am seriously deluded in that I have never had the need to defend myself with a gun (and I do get out of the house even! :-). And yes, I am aware 'stats mean nothing if an incident happens to *you*'. Whenever I get embroiled in a debate of this type I am reluctantly drawn to drone on about about populations, ego, survival instinct, 'is life fair', 'is God fair', 'is there a God', theories on what one would do if they had to kill in order to save their own life etc. so suffice to say yes I know but thats not an issue to be resolved here. Melanie. -- Melanie Arabsky, Zadall Systems Group - Burnaby, BC mel@zadall.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Always just be yourself, you can never go wrong -- well unless you are a serial killer or something." - K.H.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<CzEKBv.6K0@zadall.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!rutgers!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!uunet!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!hookup!cato.Direct.CA!vanbc.wimsey.com!zadallv!melReferences:
<CzDpML.L6L@zadall.com> <1994Nov16.220528.16208@hpcvusn.cv.hp.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fb1ea,ceef072af7f91422 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1ea,public X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,ceef072af7f91422 X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public X-Google-Thread: fb374,ceef072af7f91422 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb374,public X-Google-Thread: 1044e7,ceef072af7f91422 X-Google-Attributes: gid1044e7,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-17 06:44:57 PST Newsgroups: bc.general,can.legal,can.politics,talk.politics.guns Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!rutgers!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!uunet!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!hookup!cato.Direct.CA!vanbc.wimsey.com!zadallv!mel From: mel@zadall.com (Melanie Arabsky) Subject: Re: Gun FACTS Organization: Zadall Systems Group, Inc., Burnaby BC., Canada Date: Thu, 17 Nov 1994 08:16:42 GMT Message-ID: <CzEKBv.6K0@zadall.com> References: <CzDpML.L6L@zadall.com> <1994Nov16.220528.16208@hpcvusn.cv.hp.com> Lines: 34