Article View: bc.general
Article #63660Re: Gun FACTS
From: Dennis O'Connor
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 1994 16:27
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 1994 16:27
27 lines
2493 bytes
2493 bytes
mel@zadall.com (Melanie Arabsky) writes: ] I wanted to address not this whole snippet but just the first part ] 'Why am I not allowed to own my property on my own land?". Gun owners ] are not singled out this regard - there are all kinds of rules as to ] whether you can have a live chicken on your own land, for instance. ] ] No, I am not equating chickens with firearms or even explosives - ] chickens are obviously much more dangerous... You're not kidding. My wife has been vicously attacked by chickens many times : don't enter a pen of chickens without a sturdy branch or better ! Chickens have very nasty claws, and coupled with their limited flying ability and propensity to attack when you've turned your back, it's dangerous. My wife has never been injured by a firearm. ] I just wanted to point ] out that this can't be made a case of only gun owners being picked on ] in terms of 'what you can do on your own land'. Yes, such unwarranted restrictions on private property have become all too common. Regulations like "you can't put up an antenna because we don't like the way it looks", or "all houses in this area must be at least 1500 square feet", are IMHO unconscionable. -- Dennis O'Connor doconnor@sedona.intel.com Intel i960(R) Microprocessor Division Solely responsible for what I do.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<DOCONNOR.94Nov18162741@sedona.intel.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!rutgers!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!uunet!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!gatech!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!chnews!chnews!doconnorReferences:
<1994Nov16.040333.18533@cs.sfu.ca> <k9RVVc3w165w@aroga.wimsey.com> <CzDpoL.FA2@Faximum.COM> <3aeaj9$edb@canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca> <CzEKtq.6nr@zadall.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1044e7,ceef072af7f91422 X-Google-Attributes: gid1044e7,public X-Google-Thread: fb1ea,ceef072af7f91422 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1ea,public X-Google-Thread: fb374,ceef072af7f91422 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb374,public X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,ceef072af7f91422 X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-18 16:27:41 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!rutgers!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!uunet!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!gatech!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!chnews!chnews!doconnor From: doconnor@sedona.intel.com (Dennis O'Connor) Newsgroups: bc.general,can.legal,can.politics,talk.politics.guns Subject: Re: Gun FACTS Date: 18 Nov 94 16:27:41 Organization: not much. Lines: 29 Distribution: world Message-ID: <DOCONNOR.94Nov18162741@sedona.intel.com> References: <1994Nov16.040333.18533@cs.sfu.ca> <k9RVVc3w165w@aroga.wimsey.com> <CzDpoL.FA2@Faximum.COM> <3aeaj9$edb@canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca> <CzEKtq.6nr@zadall.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ravage.intel.com In-reply-to: mel@zadall.com's message of Thu, 17 Nov 1994 08:27:25 GMT