🚀 go-pugleaf

jamie@cs.sfu.ca (Jamie Andrews) writes:

> In article <ZwcV9B2w165w@ham.almanac.bc.ca> emd@ham.almanac.bc.ca writes:
> >No, I have no problem with people expressing their point of view legally.
> >They can conduct political campaigns, lobby the government, or try to
> >persuade people to their point of view.
> >
> >What they have NO right to do is to violate the court injunction barring
> >them from blockading the road. Your right to protest my legal actions
> >ceases at the point where you interfere with my carrying out that action.
>
>      You've summed up civil disobedience very well there,
> Robert.  They protest in illegal ways, they have no legal right
> to do so, they get arrested, they get fined and/or go to jail.
> Nu?  Are you saying there should be something *else* that should
> happen to them?
>


No. The organized, concerted effort to blockade the road, however, seems
to me to be a criminal conspiracy, and the blockaders AND the organizers
ought to be charged with it.


emd@ham.almanac.bc.ca  (Robert Smits, Ladysmith B.C.)

Claiming that sex education leads to irresponsible sex is like
claiming that driver education leads to car accidents.  Laurie.Mann