🚀 go-pugleaf

As a correction to my previous post, please read the following:


In article <C8Ap3H.LDy@freenet.carleton.ca> ae446@Freenet.carleton.ca (Nigel Allen) writes:
>

[...lots deleted...]

>        The board will have the following membership: three UBC alumni,
>selected by the UBC Alumni Association and ratified by the AMS, three
>members of the AMS Student Council, two UBC students at large and up to two
>representatives from each publication. Decisions would be made by majority
>or two thirds vote.

[...rest deleted...]

>-- 
>Nigel Allen, Toronto, Ontario, Canada  ae446@freenet.carleton.ca

------------------------------
So it would probably be rude for the AMS to not ratify the selections made
by the Alumni association, but what hat does the Alumni Association wear? 
How will the two Students at large be selected?  How will "up to two
representitives from each publication" be selected before publications
themselves are approved?  Is this not a direct conflict of interest?  Will
representatives from publications automatically abstain from votes
directly relating to their respective publications?  How is this whole
damn entity responsible to students, who will be paying the bills?  What
benefit is obtained by diluting AMS control over AMS money?


-- 
Robert Froese
taganov biogeocoenose approach                  "Clearcutting is not a Crime"
taganov@unixg.ubc.ca