Article View: bc.general
Article #64048Re: Rural fire protection in BC
From: Brent Kennedy
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1993 02:41
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1993 02:41
37 lines
2777 bytes
2777 bytes
In article <1kc9jaINNrra@skeena.ucs.ubc.ca> buckland@ucs.ubc.ca (Tony Buckland) writes: > A news item yesterday reported that Smithers fire fighters > attended a fire at a trailer park, but then had to stand by > and do nothing, as a trailer burned to the ground, because > the park was just outside the town line. > > Does this imply that there is no fire protection in B.C. > except in communities with fire fighting services? Well, > obviously not, forest fires are fought. But what about > homes, farms, ranches? It seems reasonable to me for > the nearest fire fighters to turn up, even if after a > considerable time if they're based in a town 50 km away, > and possibly with a bill for services rendered afterwards > except in compassionate cases. But that's obviously not > the case in the countryside around Smithers. How about > the rest - read practically all - of the province's area > that is rural? The case you quote sounds tragic, but you have to understand all the implications of responding to a call outside the 'limit'. The cost is one part of it, as coverage is provided for people who support the department through taxes. Imagine a case where the dept. responds to a call that is 10 or 15 km outside the limit. As they are fighting that fire, a call comes in for a house fire in the middle of the city. The time to pack up equipment and drive to the other fire would be the difference between having a chance at saving the structure, and getting there in time to see the fire burning out of control. This situation is made even worse if there is loss of life in the second fire but not the first. At some point a limit has to be put on how far the dept. can go to respond to a call, and if that limit is the town line, then that has to be respected. -- # Brent Kennedy | The disease of "Trauma" is responsible for # # | more years of potential life lost than any # # brent@mikejag.wimsey.bc.ca | other disease, yet it's also the most # # | preventable, does that make any sense?? #
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Feb1.024150.22791@mikejag.wimsey.bc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!news.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!utcsri!cs.ubc.ca!van-bc!mikejag!brentReferences:
<1kc9jaINNrra@skeena.ucs.ubc.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,593bc2a0f8215a40 X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-01-31 18:41:50 PST Newsgroups: bc.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!news.ans.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!torn!utcsri!cs.ubc.ca!van-bc!mikejag!brent From: brent@mikejag.wimsey.bc.ca (Brent Kennedy) Subject: Re: Rural fire protection in BC Organization: mikejag (mike) is a private system in Vancouver, BC, Canada Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1993 02:41:50 GMT Message-ID: <1993Feb1.024150.22791@mikejag.wimsey.bc.ca> References: <1kc9jaINNrra@skeena.ucs.ubc.ca> Lines: 37