🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 03:27:09 GMT, "Jerry Mcgire" <Jerry
Mcgire@..79897896953367.hfc> wrote:

>
>"Mountain Goat" <rmgoatNO@SPAMshaw.ca> wrote in message
>news:cui192l3t7n1pqjvndhnp4b4mutu399pq1@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 01:05:28 GMT, "Semper Liber"
>> <nopolicestates??@freedom4�ll.xxx> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Semper Liber" <nopolicestates??@freedom4�ll.xxx> wrote in message
>> >news:qk0kg.54933$S61.1982@edtnps90...
>> >> Public Safety minister Stockwell Day acknowledged that ALL Canadians
>will
>> >> need to be mobilized to be fully effective in the war on terror, and
>that
>> >an
>> >> effective defence will require the government to acknowledge the
>publics
>> >> right to defend themselves lawfully.... Day stated that his government
>was
>> >> committed to restore freedoms to law abiding Canadians as part of his
>> >> government mandate to fight the terrorists war on freedom.... Day
>stated
>> >> that if this law saves even one life it will be worth  it.....
>> >
>> >Interesting to see all the pro-terrorist kooks coming out against our
>right
>> >to self-defence. Now we see who's side they are really on.
>> >
>> Usual rightard 'debate' tactic, when losing claim the other guy is
>> 'pro terrorist'.
>
>Now hold on a sec buckwheat, this coming from the same people in news group,
>who all believe only governments has right and what I've seen so far of
>idiots, just like those in government and police, who seem to get really
>upset, over anyone standing up for due process, is called a
>terrorist.....This is so predicable of useful idiots, who think they must
>believe all this fear mongering on terrorism is something everyone has too
>go along with, in order to be a good little slave.
>
>If that is as you claim, then ask yourself this.... why is Hapers government
>is so determined to remove Canadians freedom's that they hold so
>dear......Even some of the Supreme Court of Canada's nine judges were
>clearly reluctant to accept the view that security must always trump
>individual rights in such cases. Public safety may be important, observed
>Justice Louis LeBel, but it's not the whole of the law. "If we don't have
>the rest we'll be living in North Korea." Justice Morris Fish interjected
>that the true task is to balance the competing interests of the state and
>the individual, not to give absolute priority to one or the other.
>
>Just like when people who could foresee where the
>> Iraq debacle was going, were accused of being 'pro Saddam'.
>
>So you would go along to get along, even if it effected your life and your
>children's life for the betterment of the new world!
>It is not and I repeat "NOT" Usual rightard 'debate' tactic. You are either
>very ignorant of rights and liberty's or your just too fucking stupid to see
>that anyone who objects to due process is a pro-terrorist moron!
>
In fact it IS the usual rightard debating tactic as practiced in these
newsgroups by sharx, pearson, TP, carr, stunned dunce et-al.

I fucking well know my rights AND my responsibilities as a citizen of
Canada. and served in our military to defend them from foreign enemies
and fuckwads like you.


-- 

"I believe there are more instances of the abridgement
of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent 
encroachments of those in power than by violent and 
sudden usurpations." - US President James Madison

"To be a social conservative is to believe that the 
poor have too much money, and the rich don't have 
enough." - J.K. Galbraith


"You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get
yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days
is to go about repeating the very phrases which our  
founding fathers used in the struggle for independence."
 - Charles Austin Beard