🚀 go-pugleaf

"Mountain Goat" <rmgoatNO@SPAMshaw.ca> wrote in message
news:cui192l3t7n1pqjvndhnp4b4mutu399pq1@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 01:05:28 GMT, "Semper Liber"
> <nopolicestates??@freedom4�ll.xxx> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Semper Liber" <nopolicestates??@freedom4�ll.xxx> wrote in message
> >news:qk0kg.54933$S61.1982@edtnps90...
> >> Public Safety minister Stockwell Day acknowledged that ALL Canadians
will
> >> need to be mobilized to be fully effective in the war on terror, and
that
> >an
> >> effective defence will require the government to acknowledge the
publics
> >> right to defend themselves lawfully.... Day stated that his government
was
> >> committed to restore freedoms to law abiding Canadians as part of his
> >> government mandate to fight the terrorists war on freedom.... Day
stated
> >> that if this law saves even one life it will be worth  it.....
> >
> >Interesting to see all the pro-terrorist kooks coming out against our
right
> >to self-defence. Now we see who's side they are really on.
> >
> Usual rightard 'debate' tactic, when losing claim the other guy is
> 'pro terrorist'.

Now hold on a sec buckwheat, this coming from the same people in news group,
who all believe only governments has right and what I've seen so far of
idiots, just like those in government and police, who seem to get really
upset, over anyone standing up for due process, is called a
terrorist.....This is so predicable of useful idiots, who think they must
believe all this fear mongering on terrorism is something everyone has too
go along with, in order to be a good little slave.

If that is as you claim, then ask yourself this.... why is Hapers government
is so determined to remove Canadians freedom's that they hold so
dear......Even some of the Supreme Court of Canada's nine judges were
clearly reluctant to accept the view that security must always trump
individual rights in such cases. Public safety may be important, observed
Justice Louis LeBel, but it's not the whole of the law. "If we don't have
the rest we'll be living in North Korea." Justice Morris Fish interjected
that the true task is to balance the competing interests of the state and
the individual, not to give absolute priority to one or the other.

Just like when people who could foresee where the
> Iraq debacle was going, were accused of being 'pro Saddam'.

So you would go along to get along, even if it effected your life and your
children's life for the betterment of the new world!
It is not and I repeat "NOT" Usual rightard 'debate' tactic. You are either
very ignorant of rights and liberty's or your just too fucking stupid to see
that anyone who objects to due process is a pro-terrorist moron!